首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

一种新型的组合赋权方法及在水闸安全评价中的应用
引用本文:闫滨,孙友良,闫胜利,郭超,刘桐渤.一种新型的组合赋权方法及在水闸安全评价中的应用[J].长江科学院院报,2014,31(10):108-113.
作者姓名:闫滨  孙友良  闫胜利  郭超  刘桐渤
作者单位:1.沈阳农业大学 水利学院,沈阳 110866; 2.辽宁水利职业学院,沈阳 110122;3.辽宁省朝阳县水利水保局,辽宁 朝阳 122000; 4.辽宁省防汛抗旱指挥部,沈阳 110003;5.大连庄河市水务局,辽宁 庄河 116400
基金项目:辽宁省重大科技计划基金资助项目
摘    要:为提高水闸安全评价中指标权重计算的准确性与合理性,克服常用权重计算方法赋权方式单一、主观性较强和计算粗糙等弊端,引入三标度层次分析法作为主观赋权方式;提出基于改进白化权函数的离差最大化法,并以此方法作为水闸评价的客观赋权方式。在此基础上,提出了一种融合主、客观权重的新型组合赋权方法,并应用于水闸安全评价的指标权重计算。工程实例表明:该方法可操作性强,能有效利用专家经验和数据信息,减小主观因素和不确定信息的干扰,为水闸安全评价指标权重确定提供了新思路。

关 键 词:组合赋权  水闸  安全评价  权重  层次分析法  离差最大化法  
收稿时间:2013-07-15
修稿时间:2014-10-17

A Novel Combination Weighing Method and Its Application in Sluice Safety Evaluation
YAN Bin,SUN You-liang,YAN Sheng-li,GUO Chao,LIU Tong-bo.A Novel Combination Weighing Method and Its Application in Sluice Safety Evaluation[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2014,31(10):108-113.
Authors:YAN Bin  SUN You-liang  YAN Sheng-li  GUO Chao  LIU Tong-bo
Institution:1.School of Water Conservancy,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;2.Liaoning Water Conservancy Vocational College,Shenyang 110122,China;3.Bureau of Soil and Water Conservancy of Chaoyang County, Chaoyang 122000,China;4.Liaoning Provincial Headquarters of Flood Mitigation and Drought Relief,Shenyang 110003,China;5.Zhuanghe Water Resources Bureau, Zhuanghe 116400,China
Abstract:In order to improve the accuracy and rationality in calculating the index weights of sluice safety assessment, and to overcome such drawbacks as single weighing manner, strong subjectivity and rough calculation of commonly-used weights calculation method, three-scale analytic hierarchy process is introduced as a subjective weighing method. The method of maximizing deviations based on the improved whitenization weight function is proposed as an objective weighing method. On this basis, a novel combination weighing method which integrates subjective and objective weights is put forward and is applied to the index weights calculation in sluice safety assessment. Engineering examples indicate that this method is reasonably practicable with strong operability, and could effectively make use of the expertise experience and data information to eliminate the interference of subjective factors and uncertain information. It offers a new idea in determining index weights for sluice safety assessment.
Keywords:combination weighing  sluice  safety assessment  weights  analytic hierarchy process (AHP)  maximizing deviations
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江科学院院报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号