Abstract: | Conclusions Thus far urban development has been subject to the “regulation” of forces generated by the market economy. Such planning as
has existed has been overwhelmed by the dynamics of market forces, perverted priorities, political fragmentation and economic
differentiation. The joint goals of removing the “crisis” elements of urban growth and of expanding black political potential
have provided the framework in which we have analyzed revenue sharing. We have analyzed the specific Nixon and Mills proposals
as well as the general idea of revenue sharing, and compared revenue sharing proposals to present Federal aid to state and
local governments. |