Argumentation-Based Qualitative Preference Modelling with Incomplete and Uncertain Information |
| |
Authors: | Wietske Visser Koen V. Hindriks Catholijn M. Jonker |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Man Machine Interaction Group, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
|
| |
Abstract: | This paper presents an argumentation-based framework for the modelling of, and automated reasoning about multi-attribute preferences of a qualitative nature. The framework presents preferences according to the lexicographic ordering that is well-understood by humans. Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be incomplete or uncertain. The main contribution of the paper is that it shows how to reason about preferences when only incomplete or uncertain information is available. We propose a strategy that allows reasoning with incomplete information and discuss a number of strategies to handle uncertain information. It is shown how to extend the basic framework for modelling preferences to incorporate these strategies. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|