首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The Use of Organic vs. Chemical Fertilizer with a Mineral Losses Tax: The Case of Dutch Arable Farmers
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Eli?FeinermanEmail author  Marinus?H?C?Komen
Institution:(1) Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, The Hebrew University, 12, 76100 Rehovot, Israel;(2) Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Abstract:The paper focuses on farm-level nitrogen fertilization strategies of Dutch arable farmers for analyzing the substitution of organic fertilizers (manure) with chemical fertilizers. The model developed investigates the impact of the major parameters affecting the inferiority of manure compared with chemical fertilizers, including the low availability and non-uniformity of the nitrogen in manure, and the low level and high non-uniformity of plant-available nitrogen supplied via manure. The sensitivity of the optimal fertilization decisions and its associated environmental impact to product price, manure cost, and environmental tax is also examined. The theoretical analysis is applied to a representative Dutch grower of ware potatoes in the northern part of the Netherlands. The results suggest that in the absence of a subsidy the representative farmer will prefer to apply nitrogen only via chemical fertilizers.
Keywords:Dutch growers  environmental tax  fertilization strategies  manure inferiority  non-used nitrogen  ware potatoes
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号