首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

环境灾害冲击对银行违约率的影响效应研究:理论与实证分析
引用本文:王遥,王文蔚.环境灾害冲击对银行违约率的影响效应研究:理论与实证分析[J].金融研究,2021,498(12):38-56.
作者姓名:王遥  王文蔚
作者单位:中央财经大学绿色金融国际研究院/财经研究院,北京 100081; 中央财经大学金融学院,北京 102206
基金项目:* 本文感谢国家社会科学基金重点项目(18AZD013)资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
摘    要:本文通过模型模拟和基于中国数据的实证检验,分析了环境灾害损失冲击对于银行违约率的影响。本文模型模拟的结果显示,环境灾害冲击会显著提升银行体系的违约率水平,同时伴随着企业融资溢价水平的提升以及整个经济活动的萎缩;实证研究发现:环境灾害损失冲击会导致银行违约率水平显著提升。且与理论分析一致,本文实证发现宏观经济不确定性水平、企业的资本折损以及全要素生产率的下降在环境灾害影响银行违约率的过程中发挥了显著的传导作用。进一步研究发现,环境灾害冲击及其导致的银行违约率上升还会降低银行的风险偏好水平,降低放贷规模和主动风险承担,并反作用于实体企业,提升企业的融资约束和成本。本文的研究结论丰富了基于中国视角的环境物理风险研究,刻画了环境灾害损失对于银行风险的影响及其后续效应,为政策部门防范气候环境风险提供了借鉴。

关 键 词:环境灾害  物理风险  银行违约率  金融风险  

The Impact of Environmental Disasters on the Bank Default Rate: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
WANG Yao,WANG Wenwei.The Impact of Environmental Disasters on the Bank Default Rate: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of Financial Research,2021,498(12):38-56.
Authors:WANG Yao  WANG Wenwei
Institution:International Institute of Green Finance & Institute for Finance and Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics; School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics
Abstract:China has experienced frequent environmental disasters with huge negative impacts on economic and social development. The real economy and financial sector are becoming more closely aligned, and the impact of environmental disasters on the real economy will inevitably be transmitted to the financial system and institutions, affecting financial stability, generating financial risks, and generally amplifying the negative impact of environmental disasters. From the perspective of physical risk, this paper discusses the actual impact of environmental disasters on banks' default risk through dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model simulations and empirical tests using data from China's banking institutions from 2008 to 2018. This article's main contributions are as follows: First, it is one of the first theoretical and empirical studies on China's environmental risks. Second, in terms of research methods, this article simultaneously introduces disaster shock factors and the financial friction mechanism, highlighting the amplification effect of the financial accelerator mechanism on the impact of disaster shocks. Further, this article examines the impact of disaster shocks on relevant economic and financial indicators, including bank default rates. In terms of empirical research, this article uses the entropy method to construct environmental disaster loss indicators on multiple dimensions, providing empirical evidence from China of environmental risks. Third, the theoretical and empirical tests not only support the existence of environmental risks but also further analyze and explore a series of derivative consequences of environmental disasters on banks' default rates, including the impact on corporate financing constraints and banks' willingness to lend. This enriches the research perspectives on topics such as financing constraints and bank liquidity creation.The simulation results of the theoretical model show that environmental disasters significantly increase the default rate of bank credit contracts. This leads to higher risk premiums and reduces the scale of credit issuance, undermining enterprises and increasing their financing costs. Eventually, the tightening of financing constraints significantly negatively affects investment and output, reducing enterprises' leverage. Consistent with these results, the empirical tests show that environmental disasters significantly increase banks' default rates, and these findings pass a series of robustness tests. The mechanism test shows that the decline in total factor productivity, asset impairment loss and the increase in macroeconomic uncertainty are all significant transmission channels in this process. Further analysis shows that the environmental disaster effect of increasing the default rate significantly reduces the risk appetite of banks, reducing the scale of lending and risk-taking. This then restricts enterprises through tighter financing constraints and higher financing premiums, negatively affecting their operations.The main conclusions of this paper have the following policy implications: First, the systems and mechanisms to deal with environmental disasters should be improved and more attention given to the negative impacts of environmental disasters on the financial system. Next, awareness should be strengthened, and financial factors fully incorporated into the system. Second, government departments should consider the stability of the financial system when formulating disaster relief policies. Specifically, they should explore establishing disaster financial stability funds to prevent financial system runs and liquidity crises caused by extreme events. The supervision of financial institutions should include a standing disaster reserve, improving the construction of disaster recovery centers, adopting relevant incentives to guide financial institutions to reduce investment and credit for brown stranded assets, and encouraging financial institutions to engage in green finance. Third, the financial sector must fully consider climate and environmental risks and conduct environmental stress tests on a regular basis. Before launching a credit business, banks and other financial departments should thoroughly assess the climate and environmental risks of the business and region and fully consider environmental disaster risks in credit pricing. After a disaster occurs, the financial sector should also actively assist disaster-stricken enterprises through extensions and other benign interactions.
Keywords:Environmental Disaster  Physical Risk  Bank Default Rate  Financial Risk  
点击此处可从《金融研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《金融研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号