Redistributing the energy tax burden in the Philippines |
| |
Authors: | Noel D. Uri and Roy Boyd |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., USA;(2) Department of Economics, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper uses an aggregate modelling approach to assess the impacts of a redistribution of the taxes and duties that currently exist on crude oil and refined petroleum products on the Philippine economy. The approach used in the analysis consists of a general equilibrium model composed of fourteen producing sectors, fifteen consuming sectors, three household categories classified by income and a government. The effects of replacing the taxes and duties on crude oil and refined petroleum products with a more broad based tax on manufacturing and service sectors output on prices and quantities are examined. The results are revealing. For example, the consequences of redistributing the tax burden away from petroleum products to the manufacturing and service sectors of the Philippine economy will be an increase in output by all producing sectors of about 3.5 percent or about 2.4 hundred billion Philippine pesos, a rise in the consumption of goods and services by about 6.1 percent or 1.6 hundred billion Philippine pesos, a rise in total utility by 6.9 or 1.9 hundred billion Philippine pesos, and virtually no change in tax revenue for the government. When subjected to a sensitivity analysis, the results are reasonably robust with regard to the assumption of the values of the substitution elasticities. That is, while the model's equilibrium values do vary in response to different assumptions of the values of these elasticities, the fluctuations are not so enormous to suggest that the model is unrealistically sensitive to these parameters.Notation Yj Total production in sectorj (j=1, 2, ..., 14) - CDj Consumer demand for productj - GEj Government endowment of productj - UMj Imports of productj - LRASjl RAS balanced input-output intermediate demands - GDj Government demand for productj - INVj Investment in sectorj - UXj Exports of productj - SLc Supply of labor by householdc (c=1, 2, 3) - SKc Supply of capital by householdc - SDc Supply of land by householdc - DLj Demand for labor in the industryj - DKj Demand for capital in the industryj - DDj Demand for land in industryj - GDL Government demand for labor - GDD Government demand for land - TLj Tax on labor in industryj - TKj Tax on capital in industryj - TDj Tax on land in industryj - GCEi Consumer demand for consumer producti (i=1, 2, ..., 15) - Zji A 14×15 transformation matrix - RCSic RAS balanced matrix of each household's demand for each consumer good - TCj Excise tax on consumer goodj - TRNc Transfer payment to householdc - PITc Personal income tax payment for householdc - TAUc Marginal income tax rate for householdc - SAVc Savings in householdc - GCc Gross consumption of householdc - ZTA Consumption plus leisure coefficient - TE Total government endowments - EMj Demand elasticity of export demand - FEj Endowment/demand sector of adjusted elasticity of export demand - GSKj Government endowment of capital in industryj - GDKj Government demand for capital in industryj - GTL Government wage taxes on its own employees - TXOj Government output tax on industryj - TCc Consumption taxes on householdc - CGc Total government consumption by householdc - SAVc Total savings by householdc - INVj Total investment by industryjThe views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the organizations with which they are affiliated. They would like to thank Wildrido Cruz of the World Bank and Climenta Habido of the Philippine government for help in acquiring the requisite data to calibrate the model used in the analysis. They would also like to thank an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|