Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: Evaluating the common wisdom |
| |
Authors: | Robert J. Johnston Joshua M. Duke |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. George Perkins Marsh Institute and Department of Economics, Clark University, 950 Main St., Worcester, MA 01610, United States;2. Departments of Food and Resource Economics and Economics, and the Legal Studies Program, University of Delaware, United States |
| |
Abstract: | It is often argued that attribute adjustments made possible within choice experiments have the potential to improve benefit transfer accuracy. These transfers, however, often omit socioeconomic adjustments; this reflects a limited presence of socioeconomic covariates in broader choice experiments. The lack of correspondence between common guidance that socioeconomic adjustments should be applied and simultaneous arguments for the advantages of choice experiment transfers leads to ambiguity for transfer practice. This paper contrasts the change in transfer performance resulting from an ability to adjust for policy attributes with that resulting from an ability to adjust for socioeconomic attributes. Results are illustrated for the case of agricultural land preservation. The goal is to provide evidence regarding the tradeoff faced by practitioners who seek to use choice experiments for benefit transfer but lack the ability to adjust for socioeconomic attributes. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|