有关劳动价值理论的三个通约--马克思经济学与西方经济学的比较分析

我们从劳动、自然、资本生产三要素之间通约的角度，沿着经济思想史的脉络，将马克思经济学与西方经济学价值理论进行比较，分析两大经济学范式之间的区别与联系。排除自然对价值体系的影响，集中分析了劳动与资本的关系。我们认为不同程度的复杂劳动是劳动的一般形态，复杂劳动之间的通约系数应该考虑它在再生产中的地位，按照它在下一生产周期生产的产量来进行近似折算。人力资本和复杂劳动之间有互相通融的地方，它们都含有时间和技术的因素。衡量价值的量纲应是时间与技术的复合单位。在技术变化的条件下，不能单纯用劳动时间计量价值。

Three Commensurations about Labor Value Theory--A Comparative Analysis of Marxist Economics and Western Economics

We compare the value theory of Marxist economics and western economics, analyze the difference and connection between the two economic paradigms from the view of the commensurations among the three factors of labor, nature and capital production along the venation of the history of economic ideas. The influence of nature on value system is eliminated and the relationship between labor and capital is analyzed intensively. We hold that different extents of complicated work are the general forms of labor, the commensuration coefficient between complicated labors should consider its status in reproduction and should be converted approximately according to its output in the next production cycle. Manpower capital and complicated labor have some accommodations with each other, both of which contain the factors of time and technique. The dimension for measuring value is the compound of time and technique and labor time should not be used solely to calculate value if technique changes.