首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Performing culture at indigenous culture parks in Taiwan: Using Q method to identify the performers' subjectivities
Institution:1. Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, Polígono Río San Pedro s/n, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain;2. Built Environment, University of Wales, Trinity St. David, Swansea, Wales SA1 6ED, UK;3. Centro de Estudios de Medio ambiente y Energía (CEMAE), Universidad de Matanzas, Autopista Varadero, km 3 1/2, Matanzas, Cuba;4. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Borgo Albizi 28, 50122 Firenze, Italy;1. Novi Sad Business School, Vladimira Peri?a Valtera 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;2. South Ural State University, Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service 76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia;3. Geographical Institute “Jovan Cviji?”, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SASA), Djure Jak?i?a 9, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia;4. Department for Finance, St. Petersburg School of Economics and Management, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Kantemirovskaya ulitsa 3A, Office 331, Sankt Petersburg 194100, Russia;1. School of Management and Languages, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;2. Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Abstract:Performance of indigenous culture at culture parks for tourism is traditionally viewed from a modernist ontological perspective as exploitative and from a managerial perspective as the provision of a service. These views might fail to accommodate the performers' subjectivities. In this Q method study the views of the performers are identified based on a sample of 30 respondents and 42 Q sort items. Respondents were performers employed at the Indigenous Peoples Culture Park in Taiwan. The replicability of a previous Q study was tested using the same design in a different research setting. In both studies two clusters of subjectivity were found: the ‘Performers’ View’ and the ‘Instructors’ View’. Neither view conforms to the modernist or managerial perspective identified in tourism research. Instead, the reflexivity of Q suggests that in the performance of indigenous culture, these fixed ontological categories are porous and situational.
Keywords:Culture park  Performance  Q method  Reflexivity  Representation  Taiwan  Subjectivity
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号