首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Users expectations and the need for differential beach management frameworks along the Costa Brava: Urban vs. natural protected beaches
Institution:1. Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Accés a la cala St. Francesc 14, Blanes 17300, Spain;2. Centro Interdisciplinario para el Manejo Costero Integrado del Cono Sur (MCISur), Centro Universitario de la Región Este (CURE), Universidad de la República, Campus Municipal, Burnett s/n, Maldonado, Uruguay;3. Laboratori d’Enginyeria Marítima, ETSECCPB, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Jordi Girona 1-3, Campus Nord Ed. D1, Barcelona 08034, Spain;1. Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Landscape Architecture, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey;2. Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Marine Ecology, Çamburnu, 61530 Trabzon, Turkey;3. Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Geomatics, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey;1. University of Western Macedonia, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 50100 Kozani, Greece;2. National Technical University of Athens, School of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, Zografou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece;3. Forschungszentrum Küste, Merkurstraße 11, 30419 Hannover, Germany;4. Department of Marine Sciences, School of Environment, University of the Aegean, University Hill, Mitilene 81100, Greece;5. Hellenic Center for Marine Research, Anavyssos, Greece;6. Agricultural University of Athens, Department of Agricultural Economics, Athens, Greece;1. AgroParisTech, UMR 1048 SAD-APT, F-78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France;2. INRA, UMR 1048 SAD-APT, F-78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France;3. Unité Agriterr – Lecor ESITPA, 3, rue du Tronquet, CS 40118, F-76134 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex, France;4. INRA, UR 1303 ALISS, F-94205 Ivry-sur-Seine, France;1. Playascol Corporation E.U., Calle 19 No. 8-44, Santa Marta, Colombia;2. Universidad del Magdalena, Carrera 32 # 22-08, Santa Marta, Colombia;3. Fundación Universitaria Tecnológico Comfenalco, Sede C Barrio Zaragocilla, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
Abstract:Beaches are social–ecological systems where plainly physical, ecological, social and economic dimensions interact, providing several functions and services leading to improved human well-being. Although these systems can provide several protective, recreational and natural functions, only recreation has been traditionally prioritized by managers. This has led to the homogenization of beach management practices, which are poorly adapted to beach settings and beach users. While public participation was highly encouraged, decision-making has traditionally been done by a single stakeholder following a strict hierarchic order. In two antagonistic beaches (natural protected vs. urban) we assess and compare users’ expectations and perceptions that could suggest the necessity of a differential management. Behind an apparent homogeneity, significant differences were detected between these two antagonistic beaches. Although certain normal preferences were common in both beaches, natural attributes were the priority in the natural protected setting, as well as facilities in the urban one. However, the influence of traditional mass tourism model on users’ expectations was undeniable. Particular management frameworks for beaches with singular natural characteristics are necessary. A special emphasis on education and information is needed, as a cornerstone for a sustainable use of these social–ecological systems.
Keywords:Beach management  Users’ opinions  ICZM  Differential management  Costa Brava
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号