Perceptions of the ethicality of favors at work in Asia: An 11-society assessment |
| |
Authors: | Charlotte M. Karam David A. Ralston Carolyn P. Egri Arif Butt Narasimhan Srinivasan Ping Ping Fu Chay Hoon Lee Yong-lin Moon Yongjuan Li Mahfooz Ansari Christine Kuo Vu Thanh Hung Andre Pekerti Philip Hallinger Yongqing Fang Ho-Beng Chia |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon 2. Florida International University, University Park, FL, USA 3. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada 4. Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan 5. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA 6. Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China 7. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore 8. Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea 9. Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China 10. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada 11. Yuan-Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 12. National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam 13. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 14. Anabas Learning Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand 15. University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia 16. National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
|
| |
Abstract: | We explore macro-level factors that shape perceptions of the ethicality of favors in Asian workplaces using the subordinate influence ethics (SIE) measure. We also expand and use the crossvergence model to examine the cross-level relationship between socio-cultural (i.e., traditional/secular; survival/self-expression; in-group favoritism) and business ideology influences (i.e., human development level, control of corruption) on perceptions of favor-seeking at work. This study examines the perceptions of a total of 4,325 managers and professionals in a diverse set of 11 Asian societies: China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Our investigation focuses on both the “softer” (image management) and “harder” (self-serving) sides of subordinate influence attempts to seek favors, as well as the degree of ethical differentiation across these societies. Key results based on hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) suggest that both the World Value Survey’s socio-cultural values as well as in-group favoritism contribute to our understanding of influence behaviors in Asia. Likewise, level of human development and control of corruption also appear to be promising predictors of influence ethics. In sum, our results suggest that widening the scope of the crossvergence conceptualization of socio-cultural and business ideology influences engender a better understanding of differences in attitudes toward subordinate use of favoritism across Asian societies. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|