首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Forest certification in Russia: Challenges of institutional development
Institution:1. Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, UK, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP;2. Centre of Development Studies and Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, UK, Centre of Development Studies, 2nd floor, Alison Richard Building, 7 West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DT;1. IMS Team, ADMIR Laboratory, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco;2. SIWEB Team, EMI, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco;3. IRIT Laboratory, University of Toulouse, France;1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States of America;2. TimberMart-South, The Frank W. Norris Foundation, Athens, GA 30605, United States of America;1. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l''analisi dell''economia agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, p.za Nicolini 6, 38123 Trento, Italy;2. Department of Economics, University of Trento, Via Inama 5/I, 38100 Trento, Italy
Abstract:This article examines the implementation of voluntary forest certification in Russia and the role it has played so far as a mechanism of multi-level governance with the potential to create sustainable forestry. The evidence was gathered from a data-set of over a hundred in-depth interviews with individuals from business, communities, state and non-governmental organizations in several major forestry regions in the European and Far-Eastern parts of Russia. The respondents' views regarding the nature and effects of certification were wide ranging. Certification is associated with new and powerful tools that are an alternative to coercive state governance, which may become instrumental in ensuring law enforcement and sustainability. At the same time, the combination of commercial drivers behind certification and the lack of social controls may lead to the institutionalization of existing, not necessarily desirable, forestry practices. Our paper shows that the inconsistent outcomes of certification are highly related to path-dependent social institutions and local practices. The expectations for internationally-devised schemes aimed at establishing sustainable forest management can be easily thwarted by the behavior of individuals involved at the local level. Greater focus on low-level actors is required for effective realization of multi-level governance in Russian forestry.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号