首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Dealing with preference uncertainty in contingent willingness to pay for a nature protection program: A new approach
Institution:1. UMR-AMURE, Université de Brest, 12, rue de Kergoat, CS 93837, 29238 Brest Cedex 3, France;2. UMR-AMURE, Université de Brest, 12, rue de Kergoat, CS 93837, 29200 Brest Cedex 3, France;1. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States;2. Department of Food and Resource Economics, Institute of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, South Korea;3. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States;4. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, United States
Abstract:In this paper, we propose an alternative preference uncertainty measurement approach where respondents have the option to indicate their willingness to pay (WTP) for a nature protection program either as exact values or intervals from a payment card, depending on whether they are uncertain about their valuation. On the basis of their responses, we then estimate their degree of uncertainty. New within this study is that the respondent's degree of uncertainty is “revealed”, while it is “stated” in those using existing measurement methods. Three statistical models are used to explore the sources of respondent uncertainty. We also present a simple way of calculating the uncertainty adjusted mean WTP, and compare this to the one obtained from an interval regression. Our findings in terms of determinants of preference uncertainty are broadly consistent with a priori expectations. In addition, the uncertainty adjusted mean WTP is quite similar to the one derived from an interval regression. We conclude that our method is promising in accounting for preference uncertainty in WTP answers at little cost to interviewees in terms of time and cognitive effort, on the one hand, and without researcher assumptions regarding the interpretation of degrees of uncertainty reported by respondents, on the other.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号