A framework for thinking about Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) |
| |
Authors: | Colin Eden |
| |
Institution: | (1) Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, 26 Richmond Street, G1 1XH Glasgow, Scotland |
| |
Abstract: | Strategic problem solving in organizations is a social process that disturbs established social relationships. Maintaining a negotiated social order is crucial to political feasibility and to emotional commitment from the participants in relation to a solution package. However, Group Decision Support Systems that attend overly to managing social order risk group think through bounded vision . This may be avoided if emotional commitment is also encouraged through participants experiencing the problem situation from multiple perspectives and in relation to alternative solution strategies. Commitment depends upon both means/ends rationality and procedural rationality . This acknowledges the balance in providing support to a group with respect to the negotiation of social order, with the more traditional group decision support for socially negotiating order out of the problem situation. This article argues that effective Group Decision Support Systems must attend to both aspects of creating order. OR modelling methods and the support that can be provided by modern micro-computers offer a new way forward—models can be toys that a group can play with together, enabling them to create knowledge as well as use it. |
| |
Keywords: | group decision negotiation support systems procedural rationality emotional commitment political teasibility |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|