Decision theories and probabilistic insurance: an experimental test |
| |
Authors: | Carmen Herrero Josefa Tomás Antonio Villar |
| |
Institution: | (1) University of Alicante & Ivie,;(2) Department of Economics, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | This paper reports the results of an experiment in which probabilistic insurance, as proposed by Kahneman and Tversky (1979),
is compared both with full insurance and no insurance. The experimental results conform to the intuitive prediction that risk-averse
agents who are indifferent between full insurance and no insurance, will prefer full insurance to probabilistic insurance
and probabilistic insurance to no insurance. The first conclusion is incompatible with the predictions of expected utility
theory, and the second with Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory. We also show that Loomes and Sudgen's regret theory can
easily accommodate these intuitive results.
JEL Classification:
C91, D81.
We are most grateful to Graham Loomes and two anonymous referees for their very helpful comments. Financial support from the
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, under project BEC2001-0535, and from the Generalitat Valenciana under project GRUPOS03/086, is gratefully acknowledeged. |
| |
Keywords: | Probabilistic insurance prospect theory regret theory |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|