Optimal compensation for potential fatality

Cordes and Weisbrod have recently demonstrated that the requirement that the government actually compensate individuals adversely affected by public projects is likely to have serious resource allocation implications. We examine a rudimentary model of government discretionary behaviour subject to a compensation requirement in the presence of physical risks. Risk assessments are endogenous and asymmetrically held — features enabling analysis of the trade- offs between compensation and protection or information available to the government, and of the structure of compensation which motivates it to do what is objectively best for the individual. We show that, paradoxically, greater government discretion seems more likely to ensure the latter.