Separating real incentives and accountability |
| |
Authors: | Ferdinand M Vieider |
| |
Institution: | (1) Ludwig-Maximilans-University Munich, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 Munich, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Accountability—the expectation on the side of the decision maker that she may have to justify her decisions in front of somebody
else—has been found by psychologists to strongly influence decision-making processes. The awareness of this issue remains
however limited amongst economists, who tend to focus on the motivational effects of financial incentives. Accountability
and incentives may provide different motivations for decision makers, and disentangling their effects is thus important for
understanding real-world situations in which both are present. Separating accountability and incentives, I find different
effects. Accountability is found to reduce preference reversals between frames, for which incentives have no effect. Incentives
on the other hand are found to reduce risk seeking for losses, where accountability has no effect. In a choice task between
simple and compound events, accountability increases the preference for the normatively superior simple event, while incentives
have a weaker effect going in the opposite direction. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|