略论人身损害赔偿中法律正义与公平的体现

公平与正义是法律价值的应有之义,也是法律所追求的永恒主题,审判实践就是这种正义与公平的最直接体现。我国现行《民法通则》、最高人民法院的司法解释以及参照交通事故予以赔偿标准中,关于人身损害赔偿的受偿主体、精神损害、个案中的个体社会价值、归责原则中,未能充分体现民法的平等、等价有偿、公平等精神,以及赔偿范围规定不够明确,法官在审理案件中各自根据自己的理解来处理个案,由于每个法官的经历、阅历、理论水平、职业素质的差异,必然导致同类案件审理结果的差异,有的甚至大相径庭。应合理分配举证责任,规范诉讼主体,确定合理赔偿标准及分配标准,并考虑现实生活中的个体差异。

On the Personal Injury Compensation in Legal Manifestation of Justice and Fair

Equity and justice are what the law value should be as well as the eternal topic that the law pursues. The judgment fulfillment is the direct embodiment of justice and the equity. In the present《civil law general rule of PRC》, the judicatory explanation of Supreme People’s Court and the indemnification standard on traffic accident, the regulation on the subject of person damage compensation, spirit hurt, individual society value within individual case and principle of blame can not well embody the spirit of present civil law with equal, the price have given , fair etc. Furthermore, and the regulation on compensate scope is not enough explicit. The judge handles an individual case according to their own comprehension. However, the different magistrate has the different career, experience, theories level and occupation character which cause different result even thought with the same case. Therefore, the onus probandi should be distributed reasonably, so does litigation person, allocation standard and compensation standard as well as considering individual difference.