Evidence on the upstream and downstream impacts of antidumping cases |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Sanford Institute of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA;2. Department of Economics, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA;1. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Center of Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA;2. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg, PA 17815, USA;3. Laboratory of Metabolism, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA;1. University of Washington, Seattle, USA;2. Georgetown University, Washington, USA;1. Department of Chemistry, SN College, Kollam, Kerala, India;2. Department of Physics, Fatima Mata National College, Kollam, Kerala, India;3. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, Trg D. Obradovića 4, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;4. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental Protection, Trg D. Obradovića 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia;5. Department of Chemistry, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium;6. Department of Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangothri, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India;7. Department of Chemistry, S.G.College, Kottarakkara, Kerala, India;1. Department of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;2. Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece;3. Department of Economics, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece |
| |
| Abstract: | Anecdotal and theoretical evidence suggests that antidumping cases filed on behalf of domestic upstream intermediate products affect not only the upstream competitors, but also the downstream users. We empirically examine these claims using a panel of upstream/downstream product pairs over the 1977–1992 period. The results show that the imposition of antidumping duties in an upstream industry positively affects the quantity and value of domestic upstream production and negatively affects the quantity of downstream production. In addition, we find evidence that duties negatively affect the quantity value of dumped upstream imports (the harassment effect), positively affect non-dumped upstream imports in quantity terms (the diversion effect), and positively affect the value share of upstream domestic production (market-share shifting). |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
