首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Social protection for enhanced food security in sub-Saharan Africa
Affiliation:1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy;2. United Nations’ Children Fund, Kenya;3. International Labour Organization, Zambia;1. World Bank, 1818H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA;2. School of Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA), Indiana University, Northwest, IN, USA;1. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), Gen. A.K.Vaidya Marg, Goregaon (E), Mumbai 400065, India;2. Center for Development Resear ch (ZEF), University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Strasse 3, 53113 Bonn, Germany;1. Feinstein International Center, Tufts University, 114 Curtis Street, Somerville, MA, USA;2. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, United States;1. Department of Accountancy, Economics and Finance, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK;2. The Brookings Institution, USA;1. World Bank Ghana Office, Ghana;2. Development Economics Research Group, World Bank, 1818 H St. NW, Washington DC 20433, United States;3. Department of Economics, University of Maryland, 3115C Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742, United States
Abstract:This paper identifies several positive synergies between social protection programmes and enhanced entitlements to food. One function of social protection is to manage or reduce vulnerability. Several instruments are reviewed – weather-indexed insurance, public works programmes, emergency food aid and buffer stock management – which aim to stabilise income and access to food across good and bad years, or between the harvest and the hungry season. Other social protection instruments aim to raise household income and crop production, for instance agricultural input subsidies or input trade fairs, as well as public works projects that construct or maintain physical infrastructure such as rural feeder roads. This paper also argues that entitlements to food can be strengthened if social justice principles are introduced to the design and delivery of social protection programmes. Examples reviewed include rights-based approaches such as employment guarantee schemes, community-based targeting and demand-driven accountability mechanisms. The paper concludes by arguing for a comprehensive approach to social protection that will achieve sustainable food security, by combining interventions that stabilise income or food production with those that raise income or food production, and are designed and delivered in ways that enhance social justice.
Keywords:Sub-Saharan Africa  Food security  Social protection
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号