再论旅游文化学——敬复曹诗图先生

《旅游文化学新论》（以下简称《新论》）发表后，曹诗图先生撰写《略论旅游文化学的主要问题》（以下简称《问题》）一文与笔者商榷。在各自主要目标或使命尚未完成的情况下，旅游文化研究与旅游研究合流是不合理的，其结果必然是旅游文化学独立性的完全丧失。名存实亡；《新论》与《问题》主张的旅游文化学定义分别以“旅游文化与学”和“旅游与文化学”为逻辑起点，前者较为可取，后者殊属不当；在旅游文化学研究对象的表述上，《新论》并无不妥，而《问题》却游移于旅游与旅游文化之间未有决断。旅游文化学的研究重心还应回到旅游文化上来。

Further Discussion on Tourism Cultural Science

After my muck ＂A New Viewpoint on Tourism Culture Studies＂ （hereinafter referred to as ＂A New Viewpoint＂） published, Mr. Cao Shi--tu provided some different viewpoints in ＂Study on the Principal Problems on Tourism Culturology＂ （hereinafter referred to as ＂the Principal Problems＂）. Mr. Cao＇s viewpoints focus on the following： First, the integration of tourism cultural research and tourism research is reasonable contemplation. What is more, tourism cultural science has its own value and significance; Second, tourism cultural science is not about tourism culture system and tourism cultural research, but tourism science based on culturology; ＂Tourism Cultural Science＂ should focus on the relationship between tourism and culture, tourism culture constitution system and its law of development, but it＇s not proper to study on research object and definition of cultural science in ＂A New Viewpoint＂. This paper thinks： Integration of tourism cultural research and tourism research is unreasonable contemplation; they are asymmetric, as a result, independence of tourism cultural science shall disappear; Taking ＂tourism and culturology＂ as the logical beginning is wrong. Author thinks it is ＂tourism culture and science＂; Research object and definition of tourism cultural science are not tautology; ＂tourism culture system tourism experience culture, tourism interventional culture＂ is fundamentally different from popular system of ＂tourism subject culture, tourism object culture, tourism medium culture＂. Additionally, presentation of research object of tourism cultural science, something has gone wrong in ＂the Principal Problems＂.