SFAS No. 2: Auditor evaluations and input to the home office

This study examines auditors representing their local offices in their evaluations of SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, and their decision whether or not to communicate these evaluations to the home office. Preliminary interviews with four local office representatives (LORs) indicated that LOR evaluations are related to three criteria: usefulness, theory and implementation cost. The interviews further suggested that the importance of the cost criterion depends upon the extent to which the local office's clients are affected by SFAS No. 2 as well as the LOR's rank in the firm. Finally, it was also suggested that a LOR's decision to provide input to the home office is related to the magnitude of the perceived costs associated with SFAS No. 2, the extent to which the local office's clients are affected by the standard and the LOR's rank in the firm. The importance of these factors is supported by modeling responses to a field survey which asked LORs, who represent local “Big 8” offices throughout the United States, to evaluate SFAS No. 2, and to indicate whether or not they provided input to the home office on this pronouncement. Areas for future research are also discussed.