首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


“Author’s Reply: Critique of Mexico’s New Social Security Act”, Octavio Maupomé-Carvantes,July, 1999
Authors:Octavio Maupomé-Carvantes
Institution:1. John Ralfe Consulting , 24 Devonshire Rd., West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 6EU , United Kingdom;2. Prospect House, Abbey View, St. Albans, Hertfordshire AL1 2QU , United Kingdom;3. Hewitt Bacon &4. Woodrow , Prospect House, Abbey View, St. Albans, Hertfordshire AL1 2QU , United Kingdom
Abstract:Abstract

This paper considers the pension plan as part of the capital structure of the sponsoring employer. This enables lessons from financial theory concerning capital structure to be used to answer the question, “What assets should a pension fund hold?” The standard Modigliani-Miller framework is expanded on to consider the implications of corporate tax. This leads to the conclusion that bond investment for pension plans has tangible advantages over holding risky assets (e.g., equities). The paper considers a case study of the pension plan of the Boots Company, a U.K. pharmacy retailer with a pension fund of around £2.3 billion ($3.5 billion), where these ideas were put into practice. Finally, the paper discusses the value released to shareholders and the extra security members of the pension fund have derived from putting theory into practice.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号