ACCOUNTING REFORMS: DETERMINANTS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS' CHOICES |
| |
Authors: | Eugenio Anessi‐Pessina Greta Nasi Ileana Steccolini |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore;2. Assistant Professor, Bocconi University and Lecturer, SDA Bocconi;3. and Associate Professor, Bocconi University and Director, Public Management and Policy Department, SDA Bocconi, Italy.;4. The authors are respectively Professor, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore |
| |
Abstract: | The introduction of accrual accounting in Italian Local Governments has been mandated in a way that permits, and in fact encourages, a merely formal compliance. Local Governments must produce accrual‐based financial statements, but double‐entry bookkeeping is not mandatory, nor may traditional budgetary accounting be abandoned. Why, then, should they bother to introduce an integrated system of budgetary and accrual accounting? In this paper, we empirically investigate the determinants of Local Government's choices of accounting innovation. According to our results, ‘rational’ elements such as complexity, types of activities performed, presence of surpluses, and access to capital markets are seemingly unhelpful in explaining why a Local Government decides to introduce accrual accounting. What counts are ‘institutional’ and cultural explanations, such as the perceptions of CFOs and the North‐South divide. |
| |
Keywords: | local government accounting reforms innovations determinants |
|
|