| 美、德、日集体谈判制度的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄燕东,杨宜勇. 美、德、日集体谈判制度的比较研究[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2006, 8(6): 50-56 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄燕东 杨宜勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 常州工学院,江苏,常州,213022;国家发改委经济研究所,北京,100872 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文对美、德、日三国的集体谈判制度进行了比较研究,它们在主体地位、谈判结构、谈判程序、协议批准以及争议处理等方面不尽相同、各具特点。比较的结果表明,先进工业化国家的集体谈判经验主要体现在:以保障劳动三权作为立法基础,使集体谈判制度具有权威性和可操作性;保证工会的组织和运作具有独立性和代表性;以灵活务实的方式选择谈判结构等方面,这些经验非常值得借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 比较 劳资关系 集体谈判 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2700(2006)06-0050-07 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-09-25 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-09-25 |
Comparison on the Collective Bargaining System of the United States, German, and Japan |
| |
| HUANG Yan-dong,YANG Yi-yong. Comparison on the Collective Bargaining System of the United States, German, and Japan[J]. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 2006, 8(6): 50-56 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Yan-dong YANG Yi-yong |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213022, China; 2. National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing 100872, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper compares the collective bargaining systems of the United States,German,and Japan in the respects of bargaining agent,bargaining structure,negotiating procedure,voting by union members,dispute resolving.This paper argues that there is more valuable reference to China in the authority and practicability of the labor law,the independence and representative of union's operation,the flexibility and applicability of bargaining structure. |
| |
| Keywords: | comparing industrial relations collective bargaining |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《首都经济贸易大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《首都经济贸易大学学报》下载全文 |
|
