Microstructure with multiple assets: an experimental investigation into direct and indirect dealer competition

This paper uses the economic laboratory to isolate the effects of direct and indirect competition on dealer profitability. We compare these two settings: (1) three competing dealers in a single asset (direct competition) with (2) three assets with a monopoly dealer in each (indirect competition). We find that: bid–ask spreads are wider, prices are less responsive to order flow (so there is less price discovery), and per-trade dealer profits are larger in the single-asset setting. Important economic differences between these two settings include a heightened adverse selection problem in the three-asset setting and a public good nature of price discovery in the one-asset setting.