首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


One (program) for all or all (programs) for one: Evaluation of the employment program opportunity for all of the federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Institution:1. Department of Quantitative Economics, School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina;2. World Bank, Washington DC, United States;1. School of Public Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China;2. IESEG School of Management, Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221 - LEM - Lille Economie Management, F-59000 Lille, France;3. School of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China;4. College of Arts and Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States;1. Department of Economics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V5, Canada;2. Department of Economics, BSMRSTU, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh;1. Institute for East European Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany;2. Laboratory for Comparative Social Research, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia;3. Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany;4. International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia;1. EIPF, Ljubljana, Slovenia;2. School of Economics and Business and Institute for South-East Europe, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;3. School of Economics and Business and Institute for South-East Europe, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;4. School of Economics and Business and Institute for South-East Europe, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;5. CEPR, Slovenia
Abstract:Using administrative data from tax records and public employment services, this paper examines whether the largest wage subsidy program deployed in 2014 in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Opportunity for All, was effective at improving employment outcomes. Given the non-experimental design, the paper relies on propensity score matching estimators. It contributes to the literature on impact evaluations of active labor market policies (ALMPs) by exploiting detailed work histories of jobseekers to identify the control group. In the preferred specification, the program was effective in increasing employment among program participants relative to the control by 13 % 12 months after completing the subsidized period. However, the results are highly sensitive to the assumption of the starting date of the job spell in the control group, which carries information about previous work history. When changing the assumptions about the starting date of the subsidized job spell of the control group, the results remain positive in the short run, but turn out to be either larger or even negative for the medium run. In all cases, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the program is most beneficial for jobseekers of about 40 years of age and older, and for low-skilled workers.
Keywords:Low wage subsidy  Employment  Unemployment  Duration  ALMPs  Bosnia and Herzegovina
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号