Bank provision reversals and income smoothing: A case study |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Business Administration, University of Patras, University Campus, 26504 Rio - Patras, Greece;2. Department of Mathematics, University of Patras, University Campus, 26504 Rio – Patras, Greece;1. University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI, United States;2. Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States;3. University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United states;4. Old Dominion Unversity, Norfolk, VA, United States;2. Department of Accounting, H. Wayne Huizenga College of Business, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale FL 33314, United States;1. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield Business School, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK;2. Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh Business School, Mary Burton Building, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK;1. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;2. Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100085, China;3. School of Accountancy, Singapore Management University, Singapore 188065, Singapore;4. College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China;1. UNSW Sydney, School of Accounting, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;2. University of Western Australia, Accounting and Finance, Perth, WA 6009, Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Incentives for banks to achieve income targets have previously been identified as a strong motivation for income smoothing (IS). Extant literature captures bank IS indirectly via discretionary provision estimations. In turn, our study directly locates IS through loan loss provision reversals. Drawing from bounded rationality perspectives, we investigate a systemic European Bank from January 2006 to September 2017, with 15,931 unique loan portfolio-quarter observations, employing a frequency and machine learning analysis. Our empirical investigation reveals both the main incentives underlying provision reversals recognition and the reported income consequences of such reversals, in times of recession. In particular, we find that provision reversals are principally used to avoid negative reported income (i.e., net losses). There is also some evidence that provision reversals are used to avoid income decline compared to the previous quarter. Finally, we show an asymmetric pattern of provision reversals over time with an emphasis on the early recession years. Our study contributes to the efforts of policy makers (both banking and accounting regulators) to reduce opportunistic, income-increasing actions by bank executives in difficult times. |
| |
Keywords: | Bank loan provision reversals Income smoothing Income targets Bounded rationality concept Machine learning Recession M41" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" pc_yGl8eUHmUq" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Accounting G38" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" pc_JJpPc2bbg6" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Government Policy and Regulation G21" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" pc_ZYa4JxPU8z" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Banks |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|