| 中美 “双反措施” WTO争端案上诉机构有关双重救济裁决述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龚柏华. 中美 “双反措施” WTO争端案上诉机构有关双重救济裁决述评[J]. 国际商务研究, 2011, 32(3): 45-51 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龚柏华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 上海哲学社会科学规划项目“上海地方政府鼓励企业出口措施与WTO反补贴合规性研究”(项目编号:2009BFX003)阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2011年3月11日,WTO上诉机构公布了"美国——对来自中国某些产品最终反倾销和反补贴税措施"一案的裁决报告,推翻了原专家组的裁定,认为美国对中国进口产品同时采用反倾销和反补贴措施做法构成了违反WTO规则的"双重救济"。本文认为这一裁决对中国出口企业意义重大,但同时也要防止美国利用本案裁决的含糊之处改变策略,卷土重来。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反倾销 反补贴 双重救济 WTO争端解决 |
The Double Remedy Issue in the Sino-American WTO Dispute Case about United States-Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China |
| |
| GONG Bai-hua. The Double Remedy Issue in the Sino-American WTO Dispute Case about United States-Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China[J]. International Business Research, 2011, 32(3): 45-51 |
| |
| Authors: | GONG Bai-hua |
| |
| Affiliation: | GONG Bai-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | On March 11,2011,the Appellate Body issued its decision on the Sino-American WTO Dispute Case about United States-Definitive Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China,reversing the earlier Panel ruling.The Appellate Body,among the other things,regarded the U.S concurrently using the anti-dumping and countervailing as the double remedy which violating the related WTO rule.This article agrees that it could be a milestone case for Chinese export enterprises.However,this article ment... |
| |
| Keywords: | anti-dumping countervailing duty double remedy WTO dispute settlement |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《国际商务研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《国际商务研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
