| Abstract: | Deterministic forecasts (as opposed to ensemble or probabilistic forecasts) issued by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models require post-processing. Such corrective procedure can be viewed as a form of calibration. It is well known that, based on different objective functions, e.g., minimizing the mean square error or the mean absolute error, the calibrated forecasts have different impacts on verification. In this regard, this paper investigates how a calibration directive can affect various aspects of forecast quality outlined in the Murphy–Winkler distribution-oriented verification framework. It is argued that the correlation coefficient is the best measure for the potential performance of NWP forecast verification when linear calibration is involved, because (1) it is not affected by the directive of linear calibration, (2) it can be used to compute the skill score of the linearly calibrated forecasts, and (3) it can avoid the potential deficiency of using squared error to rank forecasts. Since no single error metric can fully represent all aspects of forecast quality, forecasters need to understand the trade-offs between different calibration strategies. To echo the increasing need to bridge atmospheric sciences, renewable energy engineering, and power system engineering, as to move toward the grand goal of carbon neutrality, this paper first provides a brief introduction to solar forecasting, and then revolves its discussion around a solar forecasting case study, such that the readers of this journal can gain further understanding on the subject and thus potentially contribute to it. |
