首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

应诉费用与反倾销应诉行为选择分析——基于不能达成协议的Cournot模型
引用本文:石碧涛,张捷.应诉费用与反倾销应诉行为选择分析——基于不能达成协议的Cournot模型[J].国际经贸探索,2008,24(8).
作者姓名:石碧涛  张捷
作者单位:暨南大学经济学院,广东,广州,510632
摘    要:文章以Cournot同质产品竞争模型为基础,建立了反倾销应诉费用内生化模型,分析了反倾销诉讼发起国企业(进口替代企业)与应诉企业(出口企业)的行为选择(假定两者不能达成协议).表明应诉费用越高,即设置的应诉门槛越高,进口替代企业越有利.而对出口企业而言,则存在一个最佳应诉费用点,在其期望应诉费用未到达该最佳应诉费用点之前,越努力去应诉对自身越有利.在实践中,被提起反倾销诉讼的中国出口企业面临的应诉成本往往很高,超过了企业自身的期望成本和承受能力,导致出现不应诉或应诉不力的结果.

关 键 词:反倾销  最佳应诉费用点  Cournot竞争

Analysis of Anti-dumping Litigation-Responding Fees and Behavior Choices Based on the Cournot Model without Agreements
SHI Bi-tao,ZHANG Jie.Analysis of Anti-dumping Litigation-Responding Fees and Behavior Choices Based on the Cournot Model without Agreements[J].International Economics and Trade Research,2008,24(8).
Authors:SHI Bi-tao  ZHANG Jie
Institution:SHI Bi-tao,ZhANG Jie (Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
Abstract:Based on the homogenous Cournot Model,this paper builds an endogenous antidumping Litigation-Responding fees model and analyzes the behavior choices of the import-substitute firm (petitioning firm) and the export firm (responding firm) under the circumstance of no reached agreement. The results drawn from the model show that: (I) The higher the Litigation-Responding fee is,the more benefits the import-substitute firm can deserve; (II) As for the export firm,there exits the best Litigation-Responding fees po...
Keywords:antidumping  optical point of Litigation-Responding fees  Cournot competition  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号