| Abstract: | This article examines a series of hypotheses about the Latin American industrialization process put forward by the structuralist school of thought, using Mexico as a test case. In particular it examines the relationship between the distribution of income and associated patterns of consumption and industrial structure and its implications on demand-constraints, growth- constraints, employment constraint and multinational control. The results indicate that the modern-traditional dichotomy based on durable versus non-durable consumer goods is not the best way to examine this relationship since the consumption patterns for durable goods do not show a homogeneous behavior when distribution changes. Overall, it was found that growth and employment constraints and multinational control seem to get more exacerbated under greater inequality. With respect to the demand-constraints no definite conclusion can be made because of the mentioned heterogeneity in the response of durable goods to changes in distribution and the lack of information on relative excess capacity and/or dynamic linkages of the different sectors. |
