首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

责任式创新研究的时空向度透视与知识框架建构
引用本文:汪万,蔡三发,杨坤.责任式创新研究的时空向度透视与知识框架建构[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(10):151-160.
作者姓名:汪万  蔡三发  杨坤
作者单位:(1.同济大学 经济与管理学院,上海 200092;2.上海工程技术大学 管理学院,上海 201620)
基金项目:全国教育科学“十三五”规划(国家一般)项目(BIA190205);上海哲学社会科学规划基金项目(2019EGL017)
摘    要:在科技社会深度融合发展的背景下,聚焦责任式创新,以2009―2020年WOS和CNKI数据库中879篇文献为样本,综合运用文献计量分析、因子分析和多维尺度分析,从时间和空间视角探索责任式创新研究的外部特征、热点内容、前沿趋势,并构建该领域知识框架。研究结果表明:①近12年国内外研究发文量总体呈上升趋势,但国内研究热度较低且尚处于初始阶段,国外科研合作网络紧密,积极推动该领域研究发展,同时该领域研究呈现跨学科特征,并逐渐形成学科交叉下的知识流动路径;②研究热点可分为4个方面,即内涵及理论框架构建研究,责任式创新与利益相关者参与研究,责任式创新跨界结合研究,责任式创新方法、实践及评估研究,研究前沿趋势可分为3个方面,即责任式创新与伦理规范研究、责任式创新与新兴技术治理研究、责任式创新的社会嵌入与政治议程研究;③基于因子分析和多维尺度分析,构建责任式创新的“情境―理论内涵―干预―机制―结果”CTIMO知识框架。最后,从责任式创新的制度情境、实践及扩散、利益相关者管理、组织层面评估等方面提出未来研究展望。

关 键 词:责任式创新  文献计量  因子分析  多维尺度分析  
收稿时间:2021-09-26

The Spatiotemporal Dimension Clairvoyance of Responsible Innovation Research and CTIMO Knowledge Framework Construction
Wang Wan,Cai Sanfa,Yang Kun.The Spatiotemporal Dimension Clairvoyance of Responsible Innovation Research and CTIMO Knowledge Framework Construction[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2022,39(10):151-160.
Authors:Wang Wan  Cai Sanfa  Yang Kun
Institution:(1.School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;2.School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)
Abstract:With the deep integration of technology and society, responsible innovation has become a hot academic issue. This study selects the journal papers related to responsible innovation from Web of Science and CNKI databases, and comprehensively uses quantitative analysis methods such as bibliometrics and multivariate statistics to visually analyze the external characteristics, hot topics and cutting-edge trends, and clarify the subject knowledge base of research in this field. Then it explores the construction of a knowledge framework for responsible innovation, providing a reference for further research in this field.#br#In terms of external characteristics, from 2009 to 2020, the volume of foreign publications, domestic publications and total domestic and foreign publications all showed an upward trend in general, but in terms of domestic and foreign comparisons, not only the number of foreign publications was significantly higher, but also earlier than domestic ones. The mainstream foreign journal Research Policy publishes fewer papers, but has the highest citation frequency, while Journal of Responsible Innovation publishes the most papers with the aim to provide a dedicated platform for comprehensively and systematically clarifying and discussing issues related to responsible innovation. The distribution of domestic mainstream journals on responsible innovation research is mainly concentrated in the disciplines of philosophy and management science. Delft University of Technology and Arizona State University started early in the field of responsible innovation and achieved fruitful results, while the University of Exeter, Arizona State University and Oxford University are at the core of the surrounding cooperation network and have a certain academic influence force. The domestic responsible innovation research institutions are mainly colleges and universities featuring agriculture, forestry, science and technology, represented by Tsinghua University and Nanjing Forestry University. Foreign responsible innovation scholars mainly play an important role in the research team represented by Stilgoe, Blok, Stahl and Fisher, etc. There are also fewer domestic scholars studying responsible innovation, mainly Mei Liang, Chen Jin, Liu Zhanxiong, et al. Responsible innovation research presents interdisciplinary characteristics, and it is an interdisciplinary subject of psychology, education, economics, politics, biology and other disciplines.#br#In terms of hot frontiers, by extracting the key words or themes that express the core contents of the literature, this study combines key word frequency and co-occurrence network analysis to explore the research development trends and hot topics in this field. The hot topics of responsible innovation research mainly focus on four aspects: responsible innovation connotation and theoretical framework construction research, responsible innovation and stakeholder participation research, responsible innovation cross-border integration research, responsible innovation methods, practice and evaluation research. At the same time, the research frontier in the field of responsible innovation is explored comprehensively based on the composite relationship method and burst detection. According to the mutation and keyword clustering of 947 co-cited documents over time, a total of 17 clusters were formed, namely innovation policy, ethics, choice environment, autonomous vehicles, RRI vision, framework, genetically modified mosquitoes, and emerging technology governance. , gene drives, ethics, law and social impact (ELSI), neuroethics, research, debate, dual use, robotics ethics, agricultural models, engaging in interdisciplinary collaborations. In recent years, mutation keywords in the field of responsible innovation include perception, biofuels, social groups, responsibility, systems, political activities, gene editing, research and experimental development, etc. Therefore, the research frontier topics in this field are mainly divided into three aspects: research on responsible innovation and ethical norms, research on responsible innovation and emerging technology governance, and research on social embeddedness and political agenda of responsible innovation.#br#In terms of knowledge framework, based on the three standards of comprehensiveness, logic and independence, following the CIMO logic proposed by relevant scholars, a responsible innovation CTIMO knowledge framework of context-theoretical connotation-interventions-mechanisms- outcomes is constructed. The CTIMO knowledge framework summarizes the research status and progress in the field of responsible innovation, especially through quantitative analysis to identify the context and theoretical connotations of this field, which helps researchers to pay more attention to contextual characteristics and theory in the following study. The connotation is embedded in the logical process of intervention, mechanism and result, which promotes the organic integration of contextual research and theory construction, and then realizes the deepening of responsible innovation research in emerging economies, emerging technologies, and interdisciplinary research. Finally, it proposes future research prospects from the institutional context, stakeholder management, and organization-level evaluation.#br#
Keywords:Responsible Innovation  Bibliometrics  Factor Analysis  Multidimensional Scaling Analysis  
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技进步与对策》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号