The concept of risk society as a model for risk regulation – its hidden and not so hidden ambitions,side effects,and risks1 |
| |
Authors: | Lucas Bergkamp |
| |
Institution: | 1. Hunton &2. Williams, Brussels, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | Beck’s risk society has become a highly influential theory in sociology and has begun to influence risk policy-making and regulation. The theory has been given too much credit, however. This article identifies and analyzes the troubling features of risk society, and demonstrates that it is a loose set of vague ideas, feelings, and hunches, rather than a theory. Risk society, as distinguished from modern industrial society, is a risk management society concerned with the identification and distribution of risks arising from industrial activities, while downplaying natural and other risks. Devoid of empirical content and analytical tools, it promotes a simplistic precautionary anti-industrial environmental and safety ethic. Risk society involves politicization of science and self-interested activism in risk management decision-making. Due to its unrealistic dogmas, ambitions, and side effects, risk society is unable to manage risks effectively and efficiently, and poses a threat to constitutional democracy. Policy-makers and risk managers, therefore, should not rely on risk society theory in designing and implementing risk management structures and regulations. |
| |
Keywords: | risk society risk policy risk management risk regulation politicization of science science in risk regulation activism politics of risk regulation |
|
|