首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Administrative Costs and Instrument Choice for Stochastic Non-point Source Pollutants
Authors:Athanasios Kampas  Ben White
Institution:(1) Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, AB15, UK;(2) School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia (Author for correspondence)
Abstract:This paper extends the empiricalanalysis of non-point source pollution to thecase where the pollutant is stochastic andalternative regulatory instruments havedifferent administrative costs. It also appliesa method of stochastic programming whereemissions are log-normally distributed. Forthe Kennet catchment in South West England werank a range of policies in terms of abatementcosts alone, and total costs (abatement andadministrative costs). On the basis ofabatement costs alone, a uniform emission taxis the cost minimising policy, but on the basisof total cost a nitrogen input tax is theleast-cost policy. Furthermore, the policyranking, based on total costs, changes as thereliability standard increases.
Keywords:instrument choice  nitrate pollution  non-point source pollutants  stochastic programming
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号