| 海上货物运输法理论流变的哲学回应(二) |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马得懿.海上货物运输法理论流变的哲学回应(二)[J].国际商务-(对外经济贸易大学学报),2009(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马得懿 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连海事大学法学院;东北财经大学法学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 辽宁省社科联2008年度科研项目立项“培育和发展辽宁邮轮经济产业私法视域研究”(项目编号2008lslktfx-64)资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 前述仅仅是问题的一个方面。为何此时期民族国家对规制海上货物运输活动表现出高涨的激情呢?让我们把目光投向法国这个当时欧洲的大国。现代欧洲国家意识牢牢地占据着19世纪初的法国,某种意义上,可以认为私法的法典化是欧洲现代国家形成中的伴随品。国家意识不断冲击法律层面的
|
| 关 键 词： | 海商法 法律制度 海上货物运输合同 承运人责任 国际贸易运输 海上货物运输法 |
Philosophical Response to the Theoretical Changes of Laws of Carriage of Goods by Sea |
| |
| MA De-yi.Philosophical Response to the Theoretical Changes of Laws of Carriage of Goods by Sea[J].International Business,2009(3). |
| |
| Authors: | MA De-yi |
| |
| Abstract: | To some extent, which the historical factors should be studied, incorporated into the laws of carriage of goods by sea, is a key issue for the purpose of the rational faulty of the laws. The obligatory character and doctrine of liability fixation included by the laws of carriage of goods by sea, is the result of reasonable choice in the view of philosophy of law which the consciousness of sources of the laws can resolve the problem of the delivery of goods without production of bill of lading that relating ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Theoretical changes Philosophical response Consciousness of sources Principle of charity Maritime Law culture |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
