Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England |
| |
Authors: | Dan van der Horst David Toke |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science (GEES), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom;2. Department of Sociology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom;1. Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, UK;2. Centre for Integrated Energy Research, University of Leeds, UK;3. Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, UK;1. Department of Geography, Queen''s Institute for Energy and Environmental Policy, Queen''s University, 68 University Avenue, Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6;2. School of Policy Studies, Queen''s University, Robert Sutherland Hall, 138 Union Street, Kingston, ON, Canada;1. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia;2. NIBIO – Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, P.O. Box 115, 1431 Ås, Norway;3. School of Geography and Planning, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3WA, Wales, UK;4. Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Department of Environmental Geography, Studentska 1768, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic;5. UNIOS – University of Osijek, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ul. kralja Petra Sva?i?a 1, 31000, Osijek, Croatia;6. Centre of Renewable Energy of Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, Tartu 51006, Estonia;7. Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Geo-Information Management, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands;8. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Research Unit Economics and Social Sciences, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland;1. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy, Vienna, Austria;2. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Developement, Vienna, Austria;3. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Landscape, Spatial and Infrastructure Science, Institute of Landscape Development and Conservation Planning, Vienna, Austria;1. Chair of Marketing and Consumer Research, Technische Universität München, Alte Akademie 16, 85350 Freising, Germany;2. Chair of Marketing and Management of Biogenic Resources, University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Straubing Center of Science, Petersgasse 18, 94315 Straubing, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Despite broad public support for wind energy in principle, windfarm developments are often met with local opposition. There is theoretical, case-based and anecdotal evidence to suggest that ‘the local’ is relevant for planning process outcomes, but the nature and extent of this relevance is not so clear. We embark on an initial exploration of local factors that, on aggregate, may be of relevance to planning outcomes of proposed windfarms in rural England. Applying a broad scanning approach we use an existing small area GIS dataset of 117 variables related to education, health, demography, employment and housing. We identify a number of strong associations, and discuss to what extent these make sense in the light of existing literature on environmental equity and social capital, or throw up questions for further study. Notwithstanding the methodological caveats of this explorative study, and the scope for more in-depth analysis, our findings suggests that beyond the myriad of individual planning cases, the emerging landscape of wind energy development in England is markedly uneven, and sometimes inequitable. Evidence of the latter emerges notably through the strong significance of local democratic deficit (i.e. low voter turn-out) as a predictor of a ‘positive’ planning outcome for windfarms and the further strengthening of predictive associations at the appeal stage. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|