Self-preservation as a foundation of rational behavior under risk |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. HBP Surgery and Transplant Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;2. Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;3. Transplant Coordination Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;4. Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;1. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;1. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;2. aQua Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany;1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore;2. Lloyd''s Register Global Technology CentrePte Ltd, Singapore 138522 |
| |
Abstract: | This paper derives an expected utility theorem from the principle of self-preservation thus providing a new interpretation of the notion of rationality underlying the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory. Self-preservation is defined as the maximization of the probability of survival in a finite horizon model where in each period the decision maker must choose a risky prospect from a feasible set of such prospects and becomes extinct if his accumulated fortune becomes non-positive. It is shown that the choice of the optimal strategy may be regarded as an expected utility maximizing behavior and that violations of the independence axiom, e.g., Allais paradox, imply that decision-makers choose a probability of survival smaller than the maximum possible given the set of acts. Furthermore, according to this approach rational attitudes toward risk are also derived from the model. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|