An Empirical Study of Platform and Derivative Product Development Projects |
| |
Authors: | Mohan V. Tatikonda |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Liège, Belgium;2. University of Antwerp, Belgium;3. Simmons University, USA;4. King''s College London, UK;1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, (SA), Italy;2. Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture (DiSt), University of Naples “Federico II”, via Forno Vecchio 36, 80134 Naples, Italy;3. CERIS and Departamento de Engenheria Civil da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Quinta da Torre, Caparica, Portugal |
| |
Abstract: | Many firms now realize the importance of planning product families and product platforms. However, little research addresses planning and execution of different types of projects within a product family platform series. This study investigates project characteristics, development challenges, typical outcomes, and success factors for product development projects at different locations in the product family spectrum. “Platform” projects result in products that initiate a new product family platform for a company. “Derivative” projects result in products consisting of extensions to an existing product family platform. Data on 108 new product development projects from a variety of assembled products industries were collected via a detailed survey and analyzed. Findings indicate that: (1) platform and derivative projects differ in project task characteristics (including the amount of new technology development undertaken and project complexity) and market newness; (2) platform and derivative projects generally do not differ in terms of project success (achievement of project objectives, level of company satisfaction, and perceived customer satisfaction) or smoothness of project execution; (3) both platform and derivative projects generally are executed in similar ways; (4) certain managerial approaches (including contingency planning, project-based evaluation of personnel, and overlap of design and manufacturing engineering) are associated with higher project execution success for both platform and derivative projects; and (5) use of interdependent technologies and novel project objectives are associated with project execution failure for platform projects. The results suggest that firms can continue to employ a single product development management process for both platform and derivative projects, as long as modest customization of the process is made for the given project type. Completely different management processes are not required. In all, the results presented in this article suggest specific managerial actions companies can take to significantly improve product development success. © 1999 Elsevier Science Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|