首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于优度评价法的西藏土地利用生态安全评价研究
引用本文:王庆日,谭永忠,薛继斌,余振国.基于优度评价法的西藏土地利用生态安全评价研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(3):48-54.
作者姓名:王庆日  谭永忠  薛继斌  余振国
作者单位:王庆日(中国土地勘测规划院,北京,100035);谭永忠(浙江大学土地资源管理系,浙江,杭州,310030;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101);薛继斌(浙江财经学院工商管理学院,浙江,杭州,310018);余振国(中国国土资源经济研究院,北京,101149) 
基金项目:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项经费项目,国家自然科学基金项目 
摘    要:研究目的:构建区域土地利用生态安全评价指标体系,定量评价西藏7个地(市)的土地利用生态安全状况。研究方法:优度评价法,可拓理论。研究结果:西藏土地利用生态安全的总体程度不高,所有地(市)表现出基本安全或不安全状态;土地利用生态安全状况存在明显的空间分异,"一江两河"中部地区最好,藏北和藏西北地区最差,其他地区居中。研究结论:优度评价法能较好地应用于区域土地利用的生态安全评价。

关 键 词:土地生态  土地利用生态安全评价  优度评价法  可拓理论
收稿时间:2009-08-05
修稿时间:2009-10-28

Assessment on the Eco-security of Land Use in Tibet Based on the Superiority Evaluation Method
WANG Qing-ri,TAN Yong-zhong,XUE Ji-bin,YU Zhen-guo.Assessment on the Eco-security of Land Use in Tibet Based on the Superiority Evaluation Method[J].China Land Science,2010,24(3):48-54.
Authors:WANG Qing-ri  TAN Yong-zhong  XUE Ji-bin  YU Zhen-guo
Institution:

1. China Land Surveying and Planning Institute, Beijing 100035, China; 2. Department of Land Resources Management of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China; 3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 4. College of Business Administration, Zhejiang Institute of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China;5. China Academy for Land Resources Economy, Beijing 101149, China

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to establish an indexes system for the assessment on the eco-security of regional land use, and then quantitatively assess the eco-security situation of land use in seven prefectures and cities in Tibet. The research methods include the superiority evaluation method and the extension theory. The results show that the overall eco-security level of land use in Tibet is not high and all the prefectures and cities show only the degrees of basic safe or unsafe. There is an obvious spatial differentiation in the eco-security of land use in Tibet, amongst which, the middle region, i.e., the so-called “one river and two streams” is ranked the best, while the north and northwest regions are ranked the worst, and other parts are ranked at the middle level. The research conclusions are that the superiority evaluation method can be well applied to the assessment on the eco-security of regional land-use.
Keywords:land ecology  land USe eco-security asessment  superiority evaluation method  extension theory
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国土地科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国土地科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号