科研自主权视域下科研评价改革研究

科研自主权在科研评价中居关键地位,但尚未引起学界足够重视。科研自主权不同于学术自由、学术自主和学术主权,不能仅将其简单理解为学术自由、自主中的一项权利。科研自主权的实质是自由进行科学研究的权利,主体通过自由开展或放弃研究行为的方式行使科研自主权,同时受到相关法律关系的约束。当前,科研评价政策已部分规定了科研自主权,但在同行评议机制、代表作制度、自主获得成果的知识产权、科研经费自主使用、科研自主权限制条件和权利救济途径等方面仍存在问题。改革科研评价应当将科研自主权纳入评价标准,科研评价中行政权力的运行应建立在保护科研人员科研自主权的基础上,而科研人员科研自主权行使准则及其限制条件需要有明确的规定。

The Reform of Scientific Research Evaluation from the Perspective of Scientific Research Autonomy

Scientific research autonomy plays a key role in scientific research evaluation, but it has not been paid enough attention in the academic circle. Scientific research autonomy is different from academic freedom, academic autonomy and academical sovereignty, and it can not be simply understood as a right in academic freedom and autonomy. The essence of scientific research autonomy is the right to carry out scientific research freely. The subject exercises scientific research autonomy through the way of freely carrying out or abandoning research behavior, and is constrained by relevant legal relations. At present, the policy of scientific research evaluation has partially stipulated the autonomy of scientific research, but there are still some problems in the aspects of peer review mechanism, representative work system, intellectual property rights of independently obtained achievements, independent use of scientific research funds, restrictions on the autonomy of scientific research and ways of right relief. In the reform of scientific research evaluation, scientific research autonomy should be included in the establishment of evaluation standards, the operation of administrative power should be based on the protection of scientific research autonomy of scientific researchers, and the rules and restrictions for the exercise of scientific research autonomy of scientific researchers should be stipulated.