Subprime Transitions: Lingering or Malingering in Default? |
| |
Authors: | Dennis R. Capozza Thomas A. Thomson |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA;(2) University of Texas, San Antonio, TX 78249-0637, USA |
| |
Abstract: | When a mortgage borrower becomes seriously delinquent (i.e., defaults), the lender initiates a time consuming and complex recovery process that may or may not result in foreclosure and eventual disposition of the real estate collateral (REO). This research studies this transition process for a unique sample of subprime mortgages that were seriously delinquent on September 30, 2001. Eight months later, possible states for the delinquent loans, in order, are 1)to remain delinquent without deteriorating further, 2) foreclosure, 3) worsen, i.e., become more months delinquent, 4) bankruptcy and 5) cure. The data indicate that, relative to prime loans, when subprime loans become seriously delinquent (90 days or longer) they are about twice as likely to become REO but take about four times longer to get there. It is unusual for a subprime default to be cured suggesting considerable forbearance by subprime lenders. We explore determinants of the transition probabilities and find that the most economically important predictors of transition from default to any other state are the number of payments the borrower has made and the loan to value ratio. |
| |
Keywords: | Subprime Mortgages Defaults Losses Lending |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|