首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A hard slog, not a leap frog: Globalization and sustainability transitions in developing Asia
Authors:Michael Rock [Author Vitae]  James T. Murphy [Author Vitae] [Author Vitae]  Paul van Seters [Author Vitae] [Author Vitae]
Affiliation:a Department of Economics, Bryn Mawr College, 101 North Merion Avenue, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010-2899, USA
b Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA
c University of Malaysia, Selangor Malaysia
d University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands
e Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan
Abstract:How does globalization influence transitions toward more sustainable socio-technical regimes in the developing world? This paper argues that transformations of regimes, the networks and institutions governing technological and environmental practices in an industry, can be positively influenced by globalization but it depends on how global forces interact with local socio-political landscapes—the political-economic institutions, values, and regulations broadly guiding an economy and its relationship to the environment. We evaluate these relationships through a comparison of two kinds of socio-political landscapes—the neo-liberal export-led development model commonly found in the developing world and the uniquely Asian capitalist developmental state. We first show how the neo-liberal model overemphasizes the power of market forces to facilitate upgrading and more sustainable industrialization. We then argue that capitalist developmental states in East and Southeast Asia have been better able to harness global economic forces for technological and sustainability transitions through an openness to trade and investment and effective public-private institutions able to link cleaner technologies and environmental standards to production activities in firms. We buttress this argument with firm-level evidence showing the evolution of socio-technical regimes in two industries—cement and electronics. The case studies demonstrate how interactions with OECD firms can contribute to environmental technique effects provided the socio-political landscape is amenable to changes in an industry's regime. Ultimately, we find the process of transition to be complex and contingent; a hard slog not a leap frog toward a potentially more sustainable future. We close by considering the limitations on the capitalist developmental state model and with comments about what else needs to be learned about globalization's role in sustainability transitions.
Keywords:Sustainable development   Technology   Industrialization   Asia   Capitalist developmental state
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号