Lotteries, Sunspots, and Incentive Constraints |
| |
Authors: | Timothy J. Kehoe David K. LevineEdward C. Prescott |
| |
Affiliation: | a Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, f1tkehoe@atlas.socsci.umn.eduf1b Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55480, f2tkehoe@atlas.socsci.umn.eduf2c Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, f3dlevine@ucla.eduf3d Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, f4ecp@res.mpls.frb.fed.usf4e Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55480, f5ecp@res.mpls.frb.fed.usf5 |
| |
Abstract: | We study a prototypical class of exchange economies with private information and indivisibilities. We establish an equivalence between lottery equilibria and sunspot equilibria and show that the welfare and existence theorems hold. To establish these results, we introduce the concept of the stand-in consumer economy, which is a standard, convex, finite consumer, finite good, pure exchange economy. With decreasing absolute risk aversion and no indivisibilities, we prove that no lotteries are actually used in equilibrium. We provide a simple numerical example with increasing absolute risk aversion in which lotteries are necessarily used in equilibrium. We also show how the equilibrium allocation in this example can be implemented in a sunspot equilibrium. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D11, D50, D82. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|