首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Lotteries, Sunspots, and Incentive Constraints
Authors:Timothy J. Kehoe  David K. LevineEdward C. Prescott
Affiliation:
  • a Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, f1tkehoe@atlas.socsci.umn.eduf1
  • b Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55480, f2tkehoe@atlas.socsci.umn.eduf2
  • c Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, 90095, f3dlevine@ucla.eduf3
  • d Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, f4ecp@res.mpls.frb.fed.usf4
  • e Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55480, f5ecp@res.mpls.frb.fed.usf5
  • Abstract:We study a prototypical class of exchange economies with private information and indivisibilities. We establish an equivalence between lottery equilibria and sunspot equilibria and show that the welfare and existence theorems hold. To establish these results, we introduce the concept of the stand-in consumer economy, which is a standard, convex, finite consumer, finite good, pure exchange economy. With decreasing absolute risk aversion and no indivisibilities, we prove that no lotteries are actually used in equilibrium. We provide a simple numerical example with increasing absolute risk aversion in which lotteries are necessarily used in equilibrium. We also show how the equilibrium allocation in this example can be implemented in a sunspot equilibrium. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D11, D50, D82.
    Keywords:
    本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
    设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

    Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号