首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Capital and Earnings Management: Evidence from Alternative Banking Business Models
Authors:Marwa Elnahass  Marwan Izzeldin  Gerald Steele
Affiliation:1. Department of Accounting and Finance, Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle NE14SE, UK;2. Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University, UK
Abstract:This paper examines whether institutional characteristics distinguishing Islamic from conventional banks lead to distinctive capital and earnings management behavior through the use of loan loss provisions. In our sample countries, the two banking sectors operate under different regulatory frameworks: conventional banks currently apply the “incurred” loan loss model until 2018 whereas Islamic banks mandatorily adopt an “expected” loan loss model. Our results provide significant evidence of capital and earnings management practices via loan loss provisions in conventional banks. This finding is more prominent for large and loss-generating banks. By contrast, Islamic banks tend not to use loan loss provisions in either capital or earnings management, irrespective of the bank's size, earnings profile, or the structure of their loan loss model. This difference may be attributed to the constrained business model of Islamic banking, strict governance, and ethical orientation.
Keywords:LLP  loan loss provisions  I-LLM  incurred loan loss model  expected loan loss model  C23  G01  G21  G28  L50  M4  IFRS  Regulatory capital management  Earnings management  Expected loan losses  Incurred loan losses
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号