Dealing with consumer default: Bankruptcy vs garnishment |
| |
Authors: | Satyajit Chatterjee Grey Gordon |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Research Department, 10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, PA 19106, United States;2. Indiana University, Department of Economics, 100 S. Woodlawn, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States |
| |
Abstract: | What are the positive and normative implications of eliminating bankruptcy protection for indebted individuals? Without bankruptcy protection, creditors can collect on defaulted debt to the extent permitted by wage garnishment laws. The elimination lowers the default premium on unsecured debt and permits low-net-worth individuals suffering bad earnings shocks to smooth consumption by borrowing. There is a large increase in consumer debt financed essentially by super-wealthy individuals, a modest drop in capital per worker, and a higher frequency of consumer default. Average welfare rises by 1% of consumption in perpetuity, with about 90% of households favoring the change. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|