我国会计准则国际趋同的思考

2010年4月2日,财政部发布了《中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图》,表明了我国对采纳国际会计准则采取积极的态度。随着经济的发展,会计准则国际趋同是一个国家适应经济全球化的必然选择。文章通过对我国会计准则国际趋同背景的描述,阐述我国会计准则国际趋同的历程,指出我国在会计准则国际趋同中遇到的障碍;针对我国具体国情,就我国会计准则在国际趋同中遇到的问题提出对策建议。     

我国企业会计规范体系的变迁及面临的挑战

随着新中国的成立,我国企业会计规范体系的建设也渐渐拉开序幕,并随着经济建设的发展和改革开放的不断深入而日渐完善,至今已基本建立了与国际财务报告准则（IFRS）体系趋同的会计规范体系。本文梳理归纳了自新中国成立以来我国会计制度和会计准则的变迁,随着《中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图》的发布,我国企业会计准则国际趋同向纵深发展,同时我国企业会计准则的发展也面临着复杂的问题与挑战,很好的解决这些问题势在必行。     

会计准则双向趋同：我国会计准则体系解析

2006年中国企业会计准则体系正式发布,这标志着我国新会计准则体系的正式建立,也标志着中国会计准则基本实现了与国际准则的趋同。在构建我国新会计准则体系的过程中,我国注重借鉴国际财务报告准则并体现我国特有的经济环境,体现了准则的双向趋同。一、双向趋同的含义自20世纪8     

财务报表列报改革及启示

会计准则国际化是各国经济发展和适应经济全球化的必然选择,我国财政部已于2010年4月2日发布《中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图》。中国作为全球最大的发展中国家和新兴市场经济国家,在会计准则已实现国际趋同的前提下,应密切跟踪国际会计准则理事会关于国际会计准则的重大修改和制定工作,并结合我国的制度背景,坚持与国际准则持续趋同的改革方向和渐进式的改革策略,以此来推进中国企业会计准则建设。     

我国会计准则国际趋同测定方法:回顾与评述

2010年4月财政部发布《中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图》后,我国会计准则的国际趋同已经进入后续趋同与持续发展的新阶段,因此对趋同效果进行准确的评估和把握具有十分重要的意义.文章基于此背景,在系统梳理我国会计准则国际趋同测定方法研究成果的基础上,逐一评述各测定方法的优劣,指出此研究领域的进展,并且对后续研究提出一些建议.     

新旧《企业会计准则》对比与思考

现行的《企业会计基本准则》指我国于1992年11月第一次颁布的《企业会计准则》（以下简称原会计基本准则）。我国加入WTO以后，会计准则的国际化趋同需要也日益迫切。2006年我国将构建起与中国国情相适应的同时又充分与国际财务报告准则趋同的、涵盖各类企业（小企业除外）各项经济业务的、独立实施的会计准则体系。发布了《企业会计准则》，该会计准则体系由一项基本会计准则和38项具体会计准则组成。     

中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图

会计准则国际趋同是一个国家经济发展和适应经济全球化的必然选择。中国企业会计准则已于2005年实现了与国际财务报告准则的趋同。2008年国际金融危机爆发后,二十国     

新制度背景下会计与税收的差异分析

现行企业会计准则自2007年实施至今，已实现了与国际的实质性趋同，随后受国际金融危机的影响，2010年财政部发布《中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则持续趋同路线图》，     

中国会计准则国际趋同的多维视角：中国会计审计准则体系发布会15日在京举行——财政部部长金人庆等领导发表重要讲话

策划人语： 2006年2月15日，财政部在京举行会计审计准则体系发布会，发布了59项企业会计准则和48项注册会计师审计准则。这标志着中国企业会计准则与国际财务报告准则之间实现了实质性趋同。它向全世界发出了一个清晰的信号：中国的会计界致力于提高透明度和执行高水准的执业准则，这既有利于会计职业，又有利于中国民众和整个中国经济。 从多维的视角研究中国会计准则国际趋同，不仅可以规避企业因财务报表转换带来的财务风险，而且也可以加速中国全面融入世界经济的步伐。[编者按]     

我国会计准则体系若干问题探讨

2006年财政部正式发布了企业会计准则体系，较之1993年的会计转制，本次会计改革主要解决会计理念、原则和方法等深层次问题。企业会计准则体系，涵盖各类企业各项经济业务并可独立实施。因此，实施新准则的企业必将结束准则与制度并存的局面。本次会计改革的显著特点是实现与国际财务报告准则的实质性趋同。会计准则的国际趋同，是当今世界财务会计发展的方向。     

国际会计准则的走向分析及其启示

本文通过回顾国际会计准则的发展历史,从国际会计准则委员会的努力和欧盟、美国等不同利益集团对国际会计准则的态度等方面,简要分析了国际会计准则的走向及其对我国会计国际协调的启示。     

The Information Content of Stock Prices,Legal Environments,and Accounting Standards: International Evidence

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of accounting standards on the information content of stock prices using a sample of 44 countries from around the world. We find that the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards or US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles per se does not make stock prices more informative, but that better accounting standards are helpful only in countries having effective legal environments. In particular, we find a significantly negative relationship between stock price synchronicity and the quality of accounting standards in countries with a common-law legal origin and generally better shareholder protection. Our findings are consistent with the theoretical prediction in Zhang [(2013). Accounting standards, cost of capital, resource allocation, and welfare in a large economy. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1459–1488] that improving accounting standards effectively would increase social welfare in general.     

The Challenge of Setting Standards for a Worldwide Constituency: Research Implications from the IASB’s Early History

Based on Camfferman and Zeff [(2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The International Accounting Standards Board, 2001–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press] we reflect on possibilities for academic research on the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and its International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs). We argue that a research agenda may be formed around the notion that the IASB differs from national standard setters because its constituent base includes jurisdictions as well as the more traditional preparer, user and auditor constituency groups. We show that taking a jurisdictional angle draws attention to the variety among the IASB’s jurisdictional constituents, identifying numerous research possibilities related to their decisions to adopt, or not to adopt, IFRSs, and to the mechanisms they have developed to form their own IFRS policies and to interact with the IASB. We illustrate how the IASB’s structure, governance, processes and standards are influenced by the challenge of reconciling the needs and values of jurisdictional constituents with the objective of setting global accounting standards. We call for research on the ramifications of the diversity of jurisdictional constituents, as well as changing perceptions of standard setting within jurisdictions, for all aspects of the functioning of the IASB. Such research should make greater use of the variety of sources available to researchers today.     

基本准则重大差异解读及其深远影响分析

本文认为,新的会计准则与现行的会计准则有较大的修订,且涵盖范围更为广泛。对新准则进行全局性的理解与把握就显得十分重要。基本准则在整个准则体系中起到统驭全局的重要作用,解读新旧基本准则的重大差异,并就其可能产生的影响加以剖析,对于深刻领会此次变革的主旨,并较为全面地理解与认识此次会计准则改革将提供有益的借鉴。     

澳大利亚会计国际化进程及其启示

自2005年开始,澳大利亚国内报告实体开始采用国际财务报告准则(IFRS),由此,澳大利亚的会计国际化进程宣告完成。本文通过回顾澳大利亚会计改革与发展历程,剖析其与IFRS趋同的内在动因,并审视澳大利亚政治、经济、立法等宏观背景对其会计国际化进程的深远影响,以期对我国的会计国际趋同提供借鉴。     

资产证券化:现状、实例运作及会计确认

资产证券化是20世纪国际金融领域中最重要的一项金融创新,它起源于美国,发展于美国,又在世界范围内得以推广。本文从国内外资产证券化的现状出发,以中集集团(CIMC)为例来详细说明了资产证券化的基本运作流程,立足于我国缺乏资产证券化规范的实际,在评价国际会计准则和美国财务会计准则的基础上,从风险与报酬分析法和金融合成分析法来对其发起人的会计要素确认问题展开讨论。     

International Accounting Standards Board （IASB） and Financial Accounting Standards Board （FASB） Convergence Project： Where Are They Now？

The convergence project between the International Accounting Standards Board （IASB） and the Financial Accounting Standards Board （FASB） in the United States （US） was signed on September 18, 2002 in Norwalk, Connecticut in the US. The first is responsible for issuing International Financial Reporting Standards （IFRS） nowadays, which were created 40 years ago. More than one century ago, local regulations are used in the US. The boards differ in years of experience. With the signing of the agreement, both institutions are working to reduce the divergence of accounting. Although they have made a significant progress, it is appropriate to examine whether the difference in approaches to accounting will affect the achieved agreements. It is relevant to investigate whether the years leading the standards adopted in different countries will impact the final result. The date of completion of the project has been postponed and still has not indicated the date of termination. This research is an analysis of the importance of the convergence of accounting standards at a global level. The study presents statistics on the status of the adoption of international standards by country. The study shows a summary of the expressions made by the directors of both boards about the future of the project.     

我国财务报告体系的改进:国际趋同下的思考

2006年我国企业会计准则的颁布使我国企业会计准则体系基本实现了与国际财务报告准则体系的趋同。与此同时,我国财务报告体系也日趋完善。然而,我国现行财务报告体系依然存在一些局限性,因此,必须结合经济环境的变化,在重思我国财务报告体系改进的新发展基础上,完善我国财务报告体系。     

International Financial Reporting Standards adoption and information quality: Evidence from Brazil

This paper examines whether the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Brazil in 2010 has improved the value relevance of accounting information, information content of earnings, financial analyst forecasting activities, and liquidity. We examine the variables in the pre‐IFRS mandatory adoption sample period, considered herein as 2008 to 2009, and the post‐IFRS adoption period of 2011 to 2012. We provide evidence demonstrating improvement in value relevance of earnings and number of analysts following the firms in the period after IFRS adoption, but we do not find improvements in information content of earnings, accuracy in analyst forecasting, and liquidity in the post‐adoption period. Our findings suggest a positive relationship between IFRS adoption and some areas of information quality in Brazil. By focusing on one important economy as it takes significant steps toward full convergence with IFRS, our study contributes to the growing literature concerning the impact of IFRS adoption around the world.