物流服务供应链整合研究北大核心CSSCI

对物流整合的研究经历了从第三方物流整合到供应链物流整合再到物流服务供应链整合的过程,然而学术界对物流服务供应链整合的内涵、结构和思路尚模糊不清。在对第三方物流整合、供应链物流整合以及服务供应链整合等理论梳理的基础上,可对物流服务供应链整合进行规定,并从基础、运作、管理和战略四个层面构建物流服务供应链整合的综合结构模型。物流服务供应链整合是产品供应链整合的一部分,更关注物流能力整合、价值流整合与关系整合。在此基础上,依据整合前因、整合过程、整合程度和整合结果的逻辑构建物流服务供应链整合的综合分析框架。我国物流企业应转变思维方式,从传统的独占思维转变为整合思维,确定供应链战略,加强信息共享和流程协调,实现物流服务供应链上服务流、信息流、资金流、知识流和价值流的"五流"合一。     

粮食供应链整合研究——基于链内、链间交互整合的概念框架简

粮食供应链整合是主导企业对粮食供应链的内、外部资源进行整合与分化的动态过程。为获取整合后的协同效应,提升企业国际竞争力,我国粮食企业供应链整合不应局限于企业或供应链的内部整合,而应侧重于主导企业供应链与合作企业供应链的交互整合。文章基于跨国粮商、中粮集团等大型粮食企业供应链的运作实践,引入主链、副链等新概念从一个全新视角对粮食供应链整合进行细分,并比较分析了链内整合、链间整合和交互整合的范围、条件和特点,最后提出一个概念框架阐释粮食供应链整合的运作机理以及整合过程、整合程度与整合绩效之间的关系,以期为我国粮食供应链的构建及其运作提供理论基础和政策建议。     

全球供应链下港口/码头整合对其竞争力的影响

以往港口和码头整合在供应链中重要性的研究涉及到关于积极主动的沿着供应链整合,促进多式联运,以及组织整合与港口和用户的合作伙伴关系。文章旨在:(1)回顾关于供应链整合和港口在供应链中整合的相关文献;(2)概念化港口/码头整合在供应链中的测量指标;(3)经验地测量供应链中港口/码头对于港口竞争力的影响,(4)概括该研究对于港口操作、航运公司、运输提供商和今后研究的意义和价值。     

我国农产品供应链整合模式与优化策略分析

自理论界将农产品与供应链结合以来,许多学者都认为整合是农产品供应链发展的方向。本文从整合的模式出发,首先阐述了当前农产品供应链的主要整合模式,其次分析了存在的普遍问题,然后提出了相关对策,最后提出了研究展望。     

供应链整合对企业绩效的影响研究 ——基于质量管理角度

企业之间的竞争已逐渐上升为供应链之间的竞争,供应链整合愈发成为企业保持竞争优势、获取可持续发展的重要战略.学术界对于供应链整合与绩效关系的研究颇为丰富,但观点却并不一致.本文提出供应链整合通过质量管理影响企业绩效的理论框架,通过收集调查问卷对理论模型进行统计检验,运用逐步多元回归的分析方法证实了供应商整合和客户整合显著...     

正向供应链与逆向供应链的整合--闭环供应链管理探讨

闭环供应链管理是顺应经济发展模式转变需要而诞生的一种全新管理哲理.本文在阐述正向/逆向供应链内涵的基础上,着重探讨了由正向/逆向供应链整合而成的闭环供应链的相关概念,并对我国医疗器械行业实施闭环供应链管理进行了应用研究,有一定实用价值.     

正向供应链与逆向供应链的整合——闭环供应链管理探讨

闭环供应链管理是顺应经济发展模式转变需要而诞生的一种全新管理哲理。本文在阐述正向／逆向供应链内涵的基础上，着重探讨了由正向／逆向供应链整合而成的闭环供应链的相关概念，并对我国医疗器械行业实施闭环供应链管理进行了应用研究，有一定实用价值。     

正向供应链与逆向供应链的整合——闭环供应链管理探讨

闭环供应链管理是顺应经济发展模式转变需要而诞生的一种全新管理哲理。本文在阐述正向/逆向供应链内涵的基础上,着重探讨了由正向/逆向供应链整合而成的闭环供应链的相关概念,并对我国医疗器械行业实施闭环供应链管理进行了应用研究,有一定实用价值。     

奶业供应链物流整合初探

文章以牛奶产品的生产、流通和消费为主要研究对象,在对牛奶产品供应链结构特点、牛奶产品供应链现状进行分析的基础上,提出理想的奶业供应链整合模式。     

基于机制设计的供应链优化整合决策效应分析

供应链的响应能力和效率是近几年来供应链管理研究的热点。通过基于机制设计对供应键整合优化机制进行探讨分析,在收益分享机制的基础上,提出了损失补偿和复合机制,并从理论上证明是优于转移价格机制的有效的供应链整合优化机制,能提高供应链的响应能力和运作效率。企业通过供应链的整合优化,其供应链成员都能从中获益,实现双赢或多赢。     

Cross‐Functional Integration: Concept Clarification and Scale Development

The centrality of cross‐functional integration (CFI) to supply chain theory and practice has long been recognized. Yet researchers continue to struggle with consistently defining or measuring the CFI construct, thus limiting the utility of CFI research. This research develops (1) a comprehensive definition of CFI that synthesizes previous supply chain research and (2) a valid set of scale items that measure the conceptual domain outlined by this definition. The goal is to build a common foundation for extending knowledge on CFI's antecedents and consequences, and ultimately to improve scholars’ ability to guide a broader practitioner community still struggling to achieve integration in their organizations.     

SUPPLY CHAIN PROCESS INTEGRATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

The current study was undertaken to further understanding of supply chain process integration. It is suggested that supply chain integration, the practice of realigning firms' operating structures, should be understood from an internal‐external perspective and a process view. Drawing upon four theories—Strategy‐Structure‐Performance framework, the resource based view of the firm, transaction cost economics, and social network analysis—and combining industry inputs, a theoretical framework of supply chain process integration is developed. It is argued that a firm's strategic priorities are key factors of supply chain process integration. Superior performance is likely to be achieved when necessary supply chain capabilities are developed through supply chain process integration.     

Improving Distribution Service Performance Through Effective Production and Logistics Integration

Current empirical research on logistics' relationships with other departments has mostly neglected the interface with production. On the basis of data from 387 manufacturing companies, we answer a recent call for research and extend the literature by examining effective working relationships and achieved integration between the production and logistics functions regarding their performance impacts and their antecedents. With respect to the former, we take a resource‐based perspective, showing that integration achieved between the production and logistics functions drives distribution service performance by serving as a pivotal capability element in the resource–capability–value chain. Within this chain, effective working relationships constitute the underlying resources and prove to be a strong driver of achieved integration. With respect to antecedents, we employ the theory of cooperation and competition and identify positive goal interdependence to substantially improve working relationships between production and logistics. Furthermore, we find this effect to be amplified via formalized performance measurement systems.     

Does high supply chain integration enhance customer response speed?

The capability of customer response speed is commonly employed by firms that wish to strengthen their relationship with customers in order to maintain a high level of service in a hypercompetitive environment of rapidly changing technology. Improved customer response speed also helps manufacturers respond more rapidly to satisfy customer needs. However, does high level of supply chain integration with customers have positive impact on customer response speed? This study proposes a conceptual model to examine antecedents to better firm performance, with customer response speed as a mediator. The conceptual model was empirically tested using data collected from 809 manufacturing companies in the Greater China Region. The results show that the nature of the relationship between customer integration and customer response speed may vary substantially from one area to another. Also, customer response speed mediates between customer integration and firm performance in China and Taiwan.     

A Global Analysis of Orientation,Coordination, and Flexibility in Supply Chains

Global supply chains are growing rapidly, and the ability to manage cross border logistics operations has become a necessity to maintain a competitive advantage in a dynamic environment. This research addresses current gaps in the literature by investigating the buyer–supplier integration dynamics in a global context with a focus on the antecedents and outcomes involved in the process. Empirical data from 320 U.S. based manufacturing companies that source from overseas was collected and used to test the framework. In addition to providing empirical evidence for the importance of orientation on collaboration, operational coordination, and integration this research explains how manufacturing companies can enhance the flexibility of their global suppliers and how that impact their logistics as well as overall firm performance. Managerial and research implications are provided as well as areas for future research.     

Cross‐Functional Integration Revisited: Exploring the Conceptual Elephant

Despite multiple decades of previous research, cross‐functional integration (CFI) remains a poorly understood concept. We argue for definitional clarity to differentiate CFI from other related concepts, such as interfirm integration or supply chain integration. We also argue for theoretical grounding to provide context for understanding the role of CFI within a firm as well as between firms. This article provides a foundation for researchers to move forward in creating a broader understanding of CFI as a focal construct of interest within the supply chain domain.     

Managing Internal Supply Chain Integration: Integration Mechanisms and Requirements

In response to globalization, diversification, and other organizational drivers, managers continue to seek organizational designs that promote integration. We study this phenomenon by focusing on requirements and mechanisms for internal supply chain integration (SCI). Using qualitative interview data, we examine how managers in manufacturing firms integrate internal supply chain activities. We elaborate and extend the information processing view by studying why organizations integrate (integration requirements) and how integration mechanisms are associated with different integration requirements. Four patterns of integration requirement–mechanism linkages emerged from our study, depicting integration mechanisms that are associated with a particular integration requirement, and those that are not. We provide a detailed examination of the multidimensional nature of integration requirements, as well as an increased understanding of how integration mechanisms are used to manage different integration requirements. These findings offer deeper insights into organizational integration, enhancing the understanding of integration in the context of internal supply chains, while also contributing to the literature on organizational design. For supply chain managers, these findings describe ways in which organizational design decisions can support internal SCI efforts with varying aims.     

The Relationship Between Strategic Supply Chain Integration and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Implications for Supply Chain Management Research

Although research evaluating the impact of supply chain integration on performance has advanced substantially in the last decade, inconsistency and considerable variability of empirical findings leave unanswered questions for both research and practice. Using a meta‐analysis, we examine empirical studies to clarify the actual relationship, suggest new directions, and ultimately contribute toward the development of supply chain management theory. We focus on “strategic” supply chain integration rather than on functional or operational/tactical studies, which would weaken the practical value of the analysis and findings. To ascertain focus and homogeneity of the sample, we adopt a rigorous search protocol and sample construction. We find that integration–performance relationships are complex and nuanced such that integration should not be universally viewed as improving performance. We identify relationships that are more generalizable and also those that need additional scrutiny. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings and provide directions for future research.     

Supply Chain Collaboration,Integration, and Relational Technology: How Complex Operant Resources Increase Performance Outcomes

How firms coordinate efforts to collectively compete as supply chains is a key concern of supply chain management scholars and practitioners. One avenue, the development of collaborative relational capabilities that support supply chain integration, offers promise. However, the effectiveness of collaboration as a supply chain resource has been questioned due to concerns associated with collaborative technologies, and thus prior research has called for a deeper examination of the role that technologies play in facilitating integration. Employing a Service‐Dominant Logic view of hierarchical resources, grounded in Resource Advantage Theory, this research tests a model subsuming relationships between collaboration, integration, and interfirm coordination technologies, and their associated performance outcomes. A sample of 282 supply chain managers from a variety of industries were surveyed, with proposed relationships examined employing structural equation modeling. Test results indicate that collaboration and integration interact to form higher order resources that collectively influence firm performance outcomes through interfirm coordination technologies.     

服务创新驱动下物流服务供应链纵向整合策略——基于链间竞争视角

文章聚焦服务创新驱动下物流服务供应链纵向整合问题,构建两条平行竞争的物流服务供应链模型,基于链间Nash竞争和链内成员Stackelberg博弈,运用逆向推导法和对比分析,深入研究了服务创新驱动下物流服务供应链的纵向整合策略与链间竞争强度对自身链及对手链整体利润的影响。研究结果表明,无论其中一条链选择何种决策,始终存在一个最优的条件,使另一条链采取不整合决策能够最大化自身链利润,同时也提升对手链的利润。同时,当服务创新成本系数较大时,LSSC整合决策与竞争强度无关：当一条链采取整合策略时,无论服务创新成本系数和竞争强度如何,另一条链采取相反决策总是最优策略。