科技型企业高管团队学习导向与创新绩效：行为整合的中介与冲突规范的调节

按照观念-行为-效果的研究路径,探讨科技型企业高管团队学习导向对创新绩效的作用机制,实证检验行为整合的中介作用与冲突规范的调节作用。通过对69个科技型企业高管团队的问卷调查与数据分析发现,学习导向对科技型企业高管团队行为整合及创新绩效均具有正向影响;行为整合在学习导向与创新绩效之间发挥部分中介作用;认知冲突规范和情感冲突规范在学习导向与行为整合的关系之间均发挥正向调节作用,利益冲突规范的调节作用没有得到数据检验的支持。建议科技型企业提升创新绩效应建设高管团队学习文化,加强对学习观念的一致认同;建立知行合一学习机制,促进高管团队形成新知识和新能力;健全高管团队内部冲突管理,培育形成良好学习氛围。     

高管团队受教育程度、组织信任对新产品绩效影响的实证研究

研究了高管团队的受教育程度及组织信任对企业新产品绩效的影响研究了高管团队的受教育程度及组织信任对企业新产品绩效的影响,运用实证研究的方法,引入高管团队的知识共享和团队自反性两个团队过程为中介变量享和团队自反性两个团队过程为中介变量,建立高管团队受教育程度、组织信任与新产品绩效的结构方程模型并进行分析。研究结果表明研究结果表明:高管团队受教育水平对新产品绩效的直接影响不显著高管团队受教育水平对新产品绩效的直接影响不显著,但其可通过直接影响团队的知识共享与自反性与自反性,进而间接地影响新产品绩效;而组织信任一方面对新产品绩效有直接正向影响而组织信任一方面对新产品绩效有直接正向影响,另一方面团队自反性及知识共享在此过程中起到部分中介作用。     

高层管理团队的冲突研究

文章在介绍团队冲突理论的基础上,通过回顾以往高管团队的冲突研究,分析了冲突对高管团队绩效的影响,冲突作为高管团队组成特征与绩效之间的中介机制,以及影响高管团队冲突的关键前置因素,最后归纳并指出了高管团队冲突领域的未来研究方向.     

企业高管团队行为整合、冲突与绩效的作用机制初探

本文基于高管团队的“高阶梯队理论”以及高管团队的特质性研究,分析探讨了企业高管团队的特质、行为整合、团队冲突及其与绩效之间的作用机制。同时,提出了高管团队行为整合、冲突与绩效的作用机制概念模型,为进一步展开实证研究提供了理论基础,也对企业高管团队的管理、培训与激励起到了借鉴作用。     

高新技术企业融资约束对创新绩效的影响 ——基于高管外部异质性视角

基于2013—2018年574家高新技术企业上市公司的财务数据,引入研发投入为中介变量,高管团队外部异质性为调节变量,实证分析了高新技术企业融资约束与创新绩效的关系.结果表明:融资约束对创新绩效具有显著的负向影响;研发投入在融资约束与创新绩效之间发挥部分中介效应;高管团队年龄异质性在研发投入和创新绩效之间起显著负向调节作用,高管团队教育背景异质性在研发投入和创新绩效之间起显著正向调节作用,高管团队任期异质性在研发投入和创新绩效之间的调节作用不显著.上述研究不仅在理论上证明了高新技术企业融资约束与创新绩效的关系以及影响路径,而且在实践上为高新技术企业高管团队的选择提供了经验证据.     

高管团队特征与公司绩效的关系——基于中小企业板上市公司的经验证据

文章以2007—2010年深圳证券交易所中小企业板上市公司为样本,实证检验了高管团队特征与公司绩效的关系。研究发现,中小企业板上市公司高管团队规模和年龄与企业绩效显著负相关;高管团队的受教育程度对公司绩效有显著的正向影响,而任职年限对公司绩效没有影响。     

高管团队特征与创业板上市公司绩效的实证研究

以249家中国创业板上市公司为研究对象,对高管团队的年龄、教育、薪酬等因素进行实证检验,探求高管团队对企业绩效的影响。研究发现,高管团队平均年龄对企业绩效有显著的负向影响,高管团队的激励措施与企业效益显著正相关。之后在公司治理方面选取了董事长和总经理两权设置和独立董事比例两个指标对各变量进行T检验,发现高管团队的独立董事比例对绩效有明显提升作用用,未发现董事长和总经理两权设置对各变量有明显影响。     

高层管理团队异质性、团队冲突和创业绩效的关系研究——以冲突管理为调节变量

为了探讨新创企业高层管理团队(TMT)异质性、团队冲突冲突管理和创业绩效的关系,本文以理论推导为基础,提出研究假设,构建了可调节的中介效应模型,对新创企业高层管理团队进行调研,运用结构方程模型检验了四者的关系。研究发现,在新创企业中TMT异质性对创业绩效具有积极的促进作用;任务冲突和关系冲突在两者之间都起到了部分中介作用;在团队冲突对TMT异质性和创业绩效的中介作用过程中,合作式和竞争式冲突管理在任务冲突和创业绩效间起到显著的调节作用,回避式冲突管理在关系冲突和创业绩效间起到显著的调节作用。研究结果为新创企业绩效改善提供了实证支持。     

综述高层管理团队认知冲突与企业绩效的关系

高管团队队成员有着不同的价值观、教育背景,因而在决策过程中不可避免的要产生认知上的冲突,这种认知冲突对于组织绩效有着积极的作用,所以,处理好团队内的冲突对于提升企业的绩效显得尤为重要。以团队协作能力和决策质量为中介变量,建立了高管团队认知冲突与企业绩效的关系的研究假设,并对企业高管团队冲突的管理提出建议。     

高管团队内薪酬差距与公司未来绩效关系研究——以广东省上市公司为个案

本文通过对广东省上市公司高管团队内薪酬差距与公司未来绩效关系的实证研究发现:高管团队内薪酬差距与公司未来年度绩效存在显著正相关关系;总经理权力、公司规模与薪酬差距对公司未来绩效有显著的负向影响;董事长、总经理两职合一公司业绩相对更好,股权集中度与公司当期绩效有微正向关系。     

时间框架效应对团队知识冲突的影响：案例研究

本文采用案例研究方法,选取ROUTE66项目团队作为研究对象,对时间框架效应影响知识冲突的机理进行了分析。研究发现,团队成员的冲突处理决策中普遍存在时间框架效应,但冲突处理决策组合受时间框架调整的影响却并不明显,时间框架效应通过影响团队知识冲突进而影响团队绩效水平。     

Counteracting Free‐Riding With Team Morale—An Experimental Study

This study focuses on a behavioral perspective to examine the detrimental effects of free‐riding on team performance, and investigates team morale as a key factor that counteracts the tendency of free‐riding among team members. Results of the empirical test imply that enhancing team morale can effectively reduce the scale of free‐riding behavior in project teams; in addition, controlling team size also provides help to constrain the undesired behavior. The two means can be carefully applied to project management during early stages of project development before the commitment of significant resources. Implications for both research and team practices are discussed.     

Team trust over time: Modeling reciprocal and contextual influences in action teams

Team trust is increasingly being recognized as important for team performance, but little is currently understood about how it develops and evolves over the course of a team's lifespan. Because trust and related team constructs are inherently dynamic, this represents a critical gap in the literature that needs to be addressed before team trust can be fully understood and effectively facilitated in practice. Of particular relevance to these gaps are action teams – those that come together to perform under time-constrained, yet often high-stakes conditions. While scholars have begun to explore how trust develops in these contexts, little is understood about how it evolves over time. As such, we propose a theoretical model of team trust in action teams that incorporates its dynamic nature, models the reciprocal relationship between team trust and team performance, delineates unique mediating pathways based on the team's progression in the multiphasic performance cycle, and considers the role of moderating influences that may strengthen or attenuate the impact of performance feedback on subsequent team trust. Specific research implications are discussed, providing a rich foundation for future empirical studies, and ultimately, the generation of evidence-based interventions for facilitating trust as teams cycle through multiple performance episodes over time.     

Team leader experience in improvement teams: A social networks perspective

In this research, we disentangle the relationship between several key aspects of a team leader's experience and the likelihood of improvement project success. Using the lens of socio-technical systems, we argue that the effect of team leader experience derives from the social system as well as the technical system. The aspects of team leader experience we examine include team leader social capital (a part of the social system) and team leader experience leading projects of the same type (a part of the technical system).We examine four different, yet related, dimensions of a team leader's social capital, which we motivate based on the social networks literature. One dimension, team leader familiarity, suggests that social capital is created when team leaders have experience working with current team members on prior improvement projects, and that such social capital increases the likelihood of improvement project success. We develop three additional dimensions, using social network analysis (SNA), to capture the idea that the improvement team leader's social capital extends beyond the current team to include everyone the leader has previously worked with on improvement projects. Contrasting our SNA-based dimensions with team leader familiarity enables us to better understand the impact of a team leader's social capital both inside and beyond the team. We also examine the effect of a team leader's experience leading prior projects of the same type, and consider the extent to which organizational experience may moderate the impact of both team leader social capital and same-type project experience.Based on analysis of archival data of six sigma projects spanning six years from a Fortune 500 consumer products manufacturer, we find that two of our SNA-based dimensions of team leader social capital, as well as experience leading projects of the same type, increase the likelihood of project success. In addition, we show that organizational experience moderates the relationship between team leader same-type project experience and project success. However, this is not the case for the relationship between the dimensions of team leader social capital and project success. These results provide insights regarding how dimensions of team leader experience and organizational experience collectively impact the operational performance of improvement teams.     

Linking Transformational Leadership and Team Performance: A Conflict Management Approach

This study develops a model in which transformational leadership affects team coordination and performance through the conflict management approaches adopted by team members. Data were collected from three different sources in a lagged design from 108 teams in a large enterprise in China. Results support the reasoning that transformational leadership promotes team coordination and thereby team performance by encouraging teams to adopt a cooperative, as opposed to competitive, approach to conflict management. These results suggest that transformational leadership may help team members manage conflicts for their mutual benefit. This is an important mechanism through which transformational leadership enhances team coordination and, in turn, achieves higher team performance.     

知识工作团队中组织公民行为的作用机制实证研究

组织公民行为是员工做出的超越基本工作职责要求的积极主动合作行为,这类行为在整体上有利于组织的有效运作。本研究以12家高科技组织中的50个知识工作团队作为研究对象,探讨团队成员整体上表现出的组织公民行为对团队绩效的影响作用机制。研究结果表明,团队整体水平的组织公民行为对团队绩效具有积极的影响作用,并且群体效能感在组织公民行为对团队绩效产生影响时起到中介作用。     

CONFLICT APPROACHES OF EFFECTIVE AND INEFFECTIVE PROJECT MANAGERS: A FIELD STUDY IN A MATRIX ORGANIZATION[1]

The conflict approaches used by project managers in a matrix organization were described by 135 project team engineers. In project teams where the managers used a combination of co-operative and confirming approaches to conflict, conflicts were judged to have a constructive impact and management was judged to be effective. Conflicts were seen as counterproductive and management was seen as ineffective when the project manager relied upon a combination of competitive and avoiding approaches to conflict. These results provided field data support for a theory of conflict management which has been tested and refined through extensive laboratory research.     

跨文化比较研究及其对跨文化团队的管理启示

企业全球化经营是跨国公司的战略选择,这必然带来不同民族文化之间的碰撞与融合,文化冲突是跨国公司面临的重大问题之一,也是跨文化团队管理冲突的重要来源,这使得跨文化管理研究具有重要的意义。当前宏观层面的跨文化比较研究成果颇丰,但跨文化团队管理研究较少。研究者应借鉴跨文化比较研究成果,加强跨文化团队管理方面的研究,提升跨文化团队管理水平及管理绩效。     

浅析在价值工程项目团队中运用建导法

价值工程(VE)经常采用项目团队工作方式进行。因此,价值工程成功与项目团队的绩效存在密切关系。团队目标、团队沟通和团队冲突等团队过程因素是影响团队绩效的重要因素,团队目标依靠团队互动达成共识,而团队沟通和团队冲突更是团队互动过程的行为要素,因此团队互动对于项目团队绩效具有重要意义。建导法是一种引导和改善团队互动过程的技术,在价值工程项目团队中运用建导法,可以使项目团队互动取得更好的效果。