Comparison of Black–Scholes Formula with Fractional Black–Scholes Formula in the Foreign Exchange Option Market with Changing Volatility

In this paper, the authors discuss the fractional option pricing with Black–Scholes formula, deduce the Fractional Black–Scholes formula, show the empirical results by using China merchants bank foreign exchange call option price, and find when the volatility is smaller, the asymptotic mean squared error of Fractional Black–Scholes is bigger than the Traditional Black–Scholes’, while the volatility is bigger—the market mechanism has a full play, the result is reverse. Namely when the market mechanism is given a full scope, the estimating effect of Fractional Black–Scholes is better than Traditional Black–Scholes’.     

A hyperbolic diffusion model for stock prices

In the present paper we consider a model for stock prices which is a generalization of the model behind the Black–Scholes formula for pricing European call options. We model the log-price as a deterministic linear trend plus a diffusion process with drift zero and with a diffusion coefficient (volatility) which depends in a particular way on the instantaneous stock price. It is shown that the model possesses a number of properties encountered in empirical studies of stock prices. In particular the distribution of the adjusted log-price is hyperbolic rather than normal. The model is rather successfully fitted to two different stock price data sets. Finally, the question of option pricing based on our model is discussed and comparison to the Black–Scholes formula is made. The paper also introduces a simple general way of constructing a zero-drift diffusion with a given marginal distribution, by which other models that are potentially useful in mathematical finance can be developed.     

Impact of Divergent Consumer Confidence on Option Prices

This paper investigates the impact of divergent consumer confidence on option prices. To model this, we assume that consumers disagree on the expected growth rate of aggregate consumption. With other conditions unchanged in the discrete-time Black–Scholes option-pricing model, we show that the representative consumer will have declining relative risk aversion instead of the assumed constant relative risk aversion. In this case all options will be underpriced by the Black–Scholes model under the assumption of bivariate lognormality. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Smart expansion and fast calibration for jump diffusions

Using Malliavin calculus techniques, we derive an analytical formula for the price of European options, for any model including local volatility and Poisson jump processes. We show that the accuracy of the formula depends on the smoothness of the payoff function. Our approach relies on an asymptotic expansion related to small diffusion and small jump frequency/size. Our formula has excellent accuracy (the error on implied Black–Scholes volatilities for call options is smaller than 2 bp for various strikes and maturities). Additionally, model calibration becomes very rapid.      

Option Pricing under Stochastic Interest Rates: An Empirical Investigation

Using daily data of the Nikkei 225 index, call option prices and call money rates of the Japanese financial market,a comparison is made of the pricing performance of stock option pricing modelsunder several stochastic interest rate processes proposedby the existing term structure literature.The results show that (1) one option pricing modelunder a specific stochastic interest ratedoes not significantly outperformanother option pricing model under an alternative stochasticinterest rate, and (2) incorporating stochastic interest ratesinto stock option pricing does not contribute to the performanceimprovement of the original Black–Scholes pricing formula.     

Estimation and Prediction of a Non-Constant Volatility

In this paper we study volatility functions. Our main assumption is that the volatility is a function of time and is either deterministic, or stochastic but driven by a Brownian motion independent of the stock. Our approach is based on estimation of an unknown function when it is observed in the presence of additive noise. The set up is that the prices are observed over a time interval [0, t], with no observations over (t, T), however there is a value for volatility at T. This value is may be inferred from options, or provided by an expert opinion. We propose a forecasting/interpolating method for such a situation. One of the main technical assumptions is that the volatility is a continuous function, with derivative satisfying some smoothness conditions. Depending on the degree of smoothness there are two estimates, called filters, the first one tracks the unknown volatility function and the second one tracks the volatility function and its derivative. Further, in the proposed model the price of option is given by the Black–Scholes formula with the averaged future volatility. This enables us to compare the implied volatility with the averaged estimated historical volatility. This comparison is done for three companies and has shown that the two estimates of volatility have a weak statistical relation.     

The Model-Free Implied Volatility and Its Information Content

Britten-Jones and Neuberger (2000) derived a model-free impliedvolatility under the diffusion assumption. In this article,we extend their model-free implied volatility to asset priceprocesses with jumps and develop a simple method for implementingit using observed option prices. In addition, we perform a directtest of the informational efficiency of the option market usingthe model-free implied volatility. Our results from the Standard& Poor’s 500 index (SPX) options suggest that themodel-free implied volatility subsumes all information containedin the Black–Scholes (B–S) implied volatility andpast realized volatility and is a more efficient forecast forfuture realized volatility.     

Proving regularity of the minimal probability of ruin via a game of stopping and control

We reveal an interesting convex duality relationship between two problems: (a) minimizing the probability of lifetime ruin when the rate of consumption is stochastic and the individual can invest in a Black–Scholes financial market; (b) a controller-and-stopper problem, in which the controller controls the drift and volatility of a process in order to maximize a running reward based on that process, and the stopper chooses the time to stop the running reward and pays the controller a final amount at that time. Our primary goal is to show that the minimal probability of ruin, whose stochastic representation does not have a classical form as does the utility maximization problem (i.e., the objective’s dependence on the initial values of the state variables is implicit), is the unique classical solution of its Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation, which is a non-linear boundary-value problem. We establish our goal by exploiting the convex duality relationship between (a) and (b).     

Empirical Study of Nikkei 225 Options with the Markov Switching GARCH Model

This paper investigates the pricing of Nikkei 225 Options using the Markov Switching GARCH (MSGARCH) model, and examines its practical usefulness in option markets. We assume that investors are risk-neutral and then compute option prices by using Monte Carlo simulation. The results reveal that, for call options, the MSGARCH model with Student’s t-distribution gives more accurate pricing results than GARCH models and the Black–Scholes model. However, this model does not have good performance for put options.     

Optimal importance sampling with explicit formulas in continuous time

In the Black–Scholes model, consider the problem of selecting a change of drift which minimizes the variance of Monte Carlo estimators for prices of path-dependent options. Employing large deviations techniques, the asymptotically optimal change of drift is identified as the solution to a one-dimensional variational problem, which may be reduced to the associated Euler–Lagrange differential equation. Closed-form solutions for geometric and arithmetic average Asian options are provided. The authors acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation under grants DMS-0532390 (Guasoni) and DGE-0221680 (Robertson) at Boston University.     

Is Mean-Variance Analysis Vacuous: Or was Beta Still Born?

We show in any economy trading options, with investors havingmean-variance preferences, that there are arbitrage opportunitiesresulting from negative prices for out of the money call options.The theoretical implication of this inconsistency is that mean-varianceanalysis is vacuous. The practical implications of this inconsistencyare investigated by developing an option pricing model for aCAPM type economy. It is observed that negative call pricesbegin to appear at strikes that are two standard deviationsout of the money. Such out-of-the money options often trade.For near money options, the CAPM option pricing model is shownto permit estimation of the mean return on the underlying asset,its volatility and the length of the planning horizon. The model is estimated on S&P 500 futures options data coveringthe period January 1992–September 1994. It is found thatthe mean rate of return though positive, is poorly identified.The estimates for the volatility are stable and average 11%,while those for the planning horizon average 0.95. The hypothesisthat the planning horizon is a year can not be rejected. Theone parameter Black–Scholes model also marginally outperformsthe three parameter CAPM model with average percentage errorsbeing respectively, 3.74% and 4.5%. This out performance ofthe Black–Scholes model is taken as evidence consistentwith the mean-variance analysis being vacuous in a practicalsense as well.     

Cross-sectional tests of deterministic volatility functions

We study the cross-sectional performance of option pricing models in which the volatility of the underlying stock is a deterministic function of the stock price and time. For each date in our sample of FTSE 100 index option prices, we fit an implied binomial tree to the panel of all European style options with different strike prices and maturities and then examine how well this model prices a corresponding panel of American style options. We find that the implied binomial tree model performs no better than an ad-hoc procedure of smoothing Black–Scholes implied volatilities across strike prices and maturities. Our cross-sectional results complement the time-series findings of Dumas et al. [J. Finance 53 (1998) 2059].     

Normal mixture diffusion with uncertain volatility: Modelling short- and long-term smile effects

This paper introduces a parameterization of the normal mixture diffusion (NMD) local volatility model that captures only a short-term smile effect, and then extends the model so that it also captures a long-term smile effect. We focus on the ‘binomial’ NMD parameterization, so-called because it is based on simple and intuitive assumptions that imply the mixing law for the normal mixture log price density is binomial. With more than two possible states for volatility, the general parameterization is related to the multinomial mixing law. In this parsimonious class of complete market models, option pricing and hedging is straightforward since model prices and deltas are simple weighted averages of Black–Scholes prices and deltas. But they only capture a short-term smile effect, where leptokurtosis in the log price density decreases with term, in accordance with the ‘stylised facts’ of econometric analysis on ex-post returns of different frequencies and the central limit theorem. However, the last part of the paper shows that longer term smile effects that arise from uncertainty in the local volatility surface can be modeled by a natural extension of the binomial NMD parameterization. Results are illustrated by calibrating the model to several Euro–US dollar currency option smile surfaces.     

Stochastic volatility options pricing with wavelets and artificial neural networks

Abstract

The paper describes an alternative options pricing method which uses a binomial tree linked to an innovative stochastic volatility model. The volatility model is based on wavelets and artificial neural networks. Wavelets provide a convenient signal/noise decomposition of the volatility in the nonlinear feature space. Neural networks are used to infer future volatility from the wavelets feature space in an iterative manner. The bootstrap method provides the 95% confidence intervals for the options prices. Market options prices as quoted on the Chicago Board Options Exchange are used for performance comparison between the Black‐Scholes model and a new options pricing scheme. The proposed dynamic volatility model produces as good as and often better options prices than the conventional Black‐Scholes formulae.     

A Stochastic Correlation Model with Mean Reversion for Pricing Multi-Asset Options

We set up a new kind of model to price the multi-asset options. A square root process fluctuating around its mean value is introduced to describe the random evolution of correlation between two assets. In this stochastic correlation model with mean reversion term, the correlation is a random walk within the region from −1 to 1, and it is centered around its equilibrium value. The trading strategy to hedge the correlation risk is discussed. Since a solution of high-dimensional partial differential equation may be impossible, the Quasi-Monte Carlo and Monte Carlo methods are introduced to compute the multi-asset option price as well. Taking a better-of two asset rainbow as an example, we compare our results with the price obtained by the Black–Scholes model with constant correlation.     

Smooth convergence in the binomial model

In this article, we consider a general class of binomial models with an additional parameter λ. We show that in the case of a European call option the binomial price converges to the Black–Scholes price at the rate 1/n and, more importantly, give a formula for the coefficient of 1/n in the expansion of the error. This enables us, by making special choices for λ, to prove that convergence is smooth in Tian’s flexible binomial model and also in a new center binomial model which we propose. Ken Palmer was supported by NSC grant 93-2118-M-002-002.     

A PDE approach for risk measures for derivatives with regime switching

This paper considers a partial differential equation (PDE) approach to evaluate coherent risk measures for derivative instruments when the dynamics of the risky underlying asset are governed by a Markov-modulated geometric Brownian motion (GBM); that is, the appreciation rate and the volatility of the underlying risky asset switch over time according to the state of a continuous-time hidden Markov chain model which describes the state of an economy. The PDE approach provides market practitioners with a flexible and effective way to evaluate risk measures in the Markov-modulated Black–Scholes model. We shall derive the PDEs satisfied by the risk measures for European-style options, barrier options and American-style options.      

When are Options Overpriced? The Black--Scholes Model and Alternative Characterisations of the Pricing Kernel

An important determinant of option prices is the elasticityof the pricing kernel used to price all claims in the economy.In this paper, we first show that for a given forward priceof the underlying asset, option prices are higher when the elasticityof the pricing kernel is declining than when it is constant.We then investigate the implications of the elasticity of thepricing kernel for the stochastic process followed by the underlyingasset. Given that the underlying information process followsa geometric Brownian motion, we demonstrate that constant elasticityof the pricing kernel is equivalent to a Brownian motion forthe forward price of the underlying asset, so that the Black–Scholesformula correctly prices options on the asset. In contrast,declining elasticity implies that the forward price processis no longer a Brownian motion: it has higher volatility andexhibits autocorrelation. In this case, the Black–Scholesformula underprices all options.